2000
DOI: 10.1007/s102030070004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearity properties of a three-moments portfolio model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, coherently with the classic arbitrage pricing theory the mean returns can be approximated by the linear pricing relation 0 where δ j for j=1,...,k, are the risk premiums relative to the different factors. In particular, when we consider a three-fund separation model which depend on the first three moments, we obtain the so called Security Market Plane (SMP) (see, among others,Ingersoll (1987),Pressacco and Stucchi (2000), and Adcock et al (2005)). However, the approaches (6),(7), and (8) generalize the previous fund separation approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, coherently with the classic arbitrage pricing theory the mean returns can be approximated by the linear pricing relation 0 where δ j for j=1,...,k, are the risk premiums relative to the different factors. In particular, when we consider a three-fund separation model which depend on the first three moments, we obtain the so called Security Market Plane (SMP) (see, among others,Ingersoll (1987),Pressacco and Stucchi (2000), and Adcock et al (2005)). However, the approaches (6),(7), and (8) generalize the previous fund separation approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, among others, Horvarth and Scott (1980),Gamba and Rossi (1998), andPressacco and Stucchi (2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are other asymmetric distributions that satisfy this property. Specifically, Simaan (1993) shows that if one adds an independent scalar asymmetric variable times a vector to an elliptical random vector, then (5) holds with s 2t = 0 (see also Gamba and Rossi, 1998;Pressacco and Stucchi, 2000). In addition, it is possible to show that (5) would also hold with s 1t + 3s 2t s 3t = 0 for a multivariate Hermite expansion in which asymmetry is a common feature (see Mencía and Sentana, 2009, for a formal definition of this density).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%