2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-s19-s11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearization of ancestral multichromosomal genomes

Abstract: Background Recovering the structure of ancestral genomes can be formalized in terms of properties of binary matrices such as the Consecutive-Ones Property (C1P). The Linearization Problem asks to extract, from a given binary matrix, a maximum weight subset of rows that satisfies such a property. This problem is in general intractable, and in particular if the ancestral genome is expected to contain only linear chromosomes or a unique circular chromosome. In the present work, we consider a relaxatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This overview is lost if we force the data to fit in a linear structure. But if a linear ancestral genome is really needed, linearization techniques exist [37], even if we would argue for linearization techniques that also put into question the input data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overview is lost if we force the data to fit in a linear structure. But if a linear ancestral genome is really needed, linearization techniques exist [37], even if we would argue for linearization techniques that also put into question the input data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the fact that for rare evolutionary events such as genome rearrangements, a parsimony approach is relevant, especially when it can be complemented by efficient algorithms to explore slightly sub-optimal solutions, such as DeClone, and to explore the parameter space. In terms of direct applications of the method developed here and in [6], gene-tree based reconstruction of ancestral gene orders comes to mind [5]; more precisely, ancestral adjacencies could be determined and scored using a mixture of their Boltzmann probability (that can be computed efficiently using DeClone) and robustness to changes of the cost scheme, and conflicts could be cleared out independently and efficiently for each ancestral species using the algorithm of [12] for example. An interesting observation is that even the set of ancestral adjacencies that are universally-parsimonious and robust to changes in the cost scheme contains a significant number of adjacencies participating in syntenic conflict.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If α = 1, i.e., we do not take evolution in terms of SCJ distance along the branches of the tree into account, we can solve the problem by applying independently a maximum-weight matching algorithm at each internal node [26]. So the extreme cases of the problem are tractable, and while we assume that the general problem is hard, we will now prove it for a small range of α. Theorem 1.…”
Section: Problem Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%