2022
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2022.3161058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearized Model for MIMO-MFSK Systems With Energy Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the matched filter offers poor BER performance. Lin et al [40] proposed to eliminate the need for CSI by using frequency shift keying and energy detection with vertical-Bell laboratories layered space-time (V-BLAST). However, the BER performance of the proposed linear detector system is significantly worse than that of the MLD as well as the coherent detectors.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the matched filter offers poor BER performance. Lin et al [40] proposed to eliminate the need for CSI by using frequency shift keying and energy detection with vertical-Bell laboratories layered space-time (V-BLAST). However, the BER performance of the proposed linear detector system is significantly worse than that of the MLD as well as the coherent detectors.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance of these time-domain signal-processing-based methods sharply declines under restricted conditions. Although energy detection can alleviate this problem under certain conditions [19,20]. As the variety of interference and clutter types grows, devising appropriate threshold levels becomes intricate, especially when the signal energy is weaker than those of interference and noise.…”
Section: Traditional Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the quantity of labeled samples is considered a crucial factor in evaluating performance, as it is challenging to obtain under non-collaborative conditions. We investigated the performance of TATR across all SNRs with a proportion of labeled samples in the training dataset, only χ = [5,10,20,30,40,60, 80, 100(%)] samples have labels in the training set. As depicted in Figure 9b, the model's performance improves as the quantity of available labeled samples increases.…”
Section: Validity Analysis and Ablation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%