2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearly Converging Quasi Branch and Bound Algorithms for Global Rigid Registration

Abstract: In recent years, several branch-and-bound (BnB) algorithms have been proposed to globally optimize rigid registration problems. In this paper, we suggest a general framework to improve upon the BnB approach, which we name Quasi BnB. Quasi BnB replaces the linear lower bounds used in BnB algorithms with quadratic quasi-lower bounds which are based on the quadratic behavior of the energy in the vicinity of the global minimum. While quasilower bounds are not truly lower bounds, the Quasi-BnB algorithm is globally… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full separation with reasonable complexity for the joint action of rotations and permutations on d × n point clouds should be achievable when d is some fixed small number (recall that typically d = 3). See [14,15] for a discussion of the dependence of the complexity of point cloud tasks on the dimension d. Another interesting question is understanding whether the 2D M + 1 cardinality we require to obtain separating invariants is optimal. As mentioned above, in phase retrieval it is known that this number can be improved, and we believe this is the case for the invariant separation problems we discuss here as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full separation with reasonable complexity for the joint action of rotations and permutations on d × n point clouds should be achievable when d is some fixed small number (recall that typically d = 3). See [14,15] for a discussion of the dependence of the complexity of point cloud tasks on the dimension d. Another interesting question is understanding whether the 2D M + 1 cardinality we require to obtain separating invariants is optimal. As mentioned above, in phase retrieval it is known that this number can be improved, and we believe this is the case for the invariant separation problems we discuss here as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm from [7] checks if two finite sets of m points are isometric in time O(m ⌈n/3⌉ log m). The latest advance is the O(m log m) algorithm in R 4 [20], see other significant results on matching bounded rigid shapes in [32,36,26,15]. The Euclidean Distance Geometry [24] studies the related problem of uniquely embedding (up to isometry of R n ) an abstract graph whose straight-line edges must have specified lengths.…”
Section: A Review Of the Past Work On Isometry Classifications And Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest advance for finite sets is the O(m log m) algorithm in R 4 [24]. Significant results on matching bounded rigid shapes and registration of finite point sets were obtained in [38,44,27,17]. The research on graph isomorphisms [40,1] can be potentially used for periodic graphs with fixed edges between points of a periodic set.…”
Section: Definitions and A Review Of Past Work On Comparing Periodic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%