2011
DOI: 10.1142/s0129054111008994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LINEARLY MANY FAULTS IN (n, k)-STAR GRAPHS

Abstract: The star graph proposed by [1] has many advantages over the n-cube. However it suffers from having large gaps in the number of possible vertices. The (n,k)-star graph was proposed in [18] to address this issue. Since it is a generalization of the star graph, it retains many of the nice properties of the star graph. There are many different measures of structural integrity of interconnection networks. In this paper, we prove results of the following type for the (n,k)-star graph. If n + (r - 1)k - g(r) vertices… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, c + 1 is proved to be tight by following the process as summarized in Theorem 4.1. The following result is recently proved in [10] for the (n, k)-star graph.…”
Section: Lemma 41 Let G Be a Graph Such That For Any T ⊂ V |T | Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In both cases, c + 1 is proved to be tight by following the process as summarized in Theorem 4.1. The following result is recently proved in [10] for the (n, k)-star graph.…”
Section: Lemma 41 Let G Be a Graph Such That For Any T ⊂ V |T | Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Cheng and Lipták [5] extended the results on S n with linearly many faults. Yuan et al [32] generalized the results on (n, k)-star graphs. Cheng et al [7] Downloaded by [University of Tasmania] at 12:05 13 October 2014 presented a similar result for the two-tree-generated networks with linearly many faults.…”
Section: Fault Tolerance Of the Hhcmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Also, Yang et al [31] proved that, in an n-star graph network S n with a subset D ⊆ V (S n ) of size |D| ≤ 2n − 4, the size of big component without D is at least |V (S n )| − |D| − 2. Moreover, Cheng and Lipták [11] computed the size of big component in cayley graphs generated by transpositions trees when deleting linearly many faults, and Yuan and Cheng [32] further proposed the size of big component in (n, k)-star graphs when deleting linearly many faults. Zhang et al in [34] proposed an efficient disk-based directed graph processing by using the component structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%