2022
DOI: 10.1080/00087041.2021.1995124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lines of Power: The Eighteenth-Century Struggle Over the Norwegian–Swedish Border in Central Scandinavia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Scandinavia, the 1751 Border Treaty between Norway and Sweden was the result of a long period of negotiations (briså 2014). Certain stretches of the border were particularly controversial, and historical maps depicting different borderline positions were part of the evidence leading to the final agreement (Lien & Lundberg 2022). According to berg (2009: 91-92), the new established borderline was "gradually solidified as a consequence of the development of modern cartography."…”
Section: Sources and Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Scandinavia, the 1751 Border Treaty between Norway and Sweden was the result of a long period of negotiations (briså 2014). Certain stretches of the border were particularly controversial, and historical maps depicting different borderline positions were part of the evidence leading to the final agreement (Lien & Lundberg 2022). According to berg (2009: 91-92), the new established borderline was "gradually solidified as a consequence of the development of modern cartography."…”
Section: Sources and Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in ginsberg 2009, hArsson & AAnrud 2016) but the political function of cartographic elements has not been subject to systematic analysis previously. The present article expands on studies initiated by the present author (Lien 2020, Lien & Lundberg 2022 and examines in greater depth the ways in which different cartographic elements were used to promote the contrasting political objectives of Norway and Sweden. This contributes to new insights regarding the political power of maps in general, and within the Scandinavian context in particular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%