2017
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-09342017000200265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic accommodation in online communication: The role of language and gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Levon and Holmes-Elliott (2013) report that working-class female speakers accentuate sex differences in their articulation of /s/, especially in mix-sex interactions in order to construct a class-based feminine identity. However, in very general terms, research finds that female speakers tend to converge more than male speakers, especially in mixed-sex interactions (Giles and Ogay 2007;Lelong and Bailly 2011;Palomares et al 2016;Perez-Sabater 2017). Namy et al (2002, p. 23) also note that both male and female speakers accommodate less to female interlocutors.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Levon and Holmes-Elliott (2013) report that working-class female speakers accentuate sex differences in their articulation of /s/, especially in mix-sex interactions in order to construct a class-based feminine identity. However, in very general terms, research finds that female speakers tend to converge more than male speakers, especially in mixed-sex interactions (Giles and Ogay 2007;Lelong and Bailly 2011;Palomares et al 2016;Perez-Sabater 2017). Namy et al (2002, p. 23) also note that both male and female speakers accommodate less to female interlocutors.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De este modo, proponemos como proyección de este estudio comparar las fórmulas de tratamiento de estas interacciones con aquellas de profesores de género masculino, debido que hay estudios que plantean que hombres y mujeres tienen estilos conversacionales distintos; por una parte, ellas estarían más interesadas en crear y desarrollar una relación, mientras que ellos se centrarían en comunicar la información y resguardar su autonomía y posición (Tannen, 1982;Silva-Corvalán, 2001;Kendall & Tannen, 2001;Pérez-Sabater, 2017). En efecto, Maltz y Broker (1982) señalan que la competencia comunicativa se desarrolla en grupos y subculturas de un mismo sexo.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified
“…The difference should not be overstated—online discourse is in a number of respects rather similar to speech (McCulloch, 2019)—but there has been relatively little work on accommodation and convergence in online written interactions. What there is suggests that convergence (whether short or long term) occurs in broadly similar ways in online written discourse as in spoken discourse (Cassell & Tversky, 2005; Pavalanathan & Eisenstein, 2015; Pérez‐Sabater, 2017). Earlier experimental work with artificial‐language interactions also found strong evidence of linguistic convergence that did not look especially dissimilar to natural‐language convergence (Roberts, 2010; Sneller & Roberts, 2018), except to the extent that artificial‐language paradigms may amplify rates of change (Roberts, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%