Linguistic Effects on the Neural Basis of Theory of Mind

Abstract

“Theory of mind” (ToM) has been described as the ability to attribute and understand other people’s desires and intentions as distinct from one’s own. There has been a debate about the extent to which language influences ToM development. Although very few studies directly examined linguistic influence on the neural basis of ToM, results from these studies indicate at least moderate influence of language on ToM. In this review both behavioral and neurological studies that examined the relationship between language and ToM are selectively discussed. This review focuses on cross-linguistic / cultural studies (especially Japanese vs. American / English) since my colleagues and I found evidence of significant linguistic influence on the neural basis of ToM through a series of functional brain imaging experiments. Evidence from both behavioral and neurological studies of ToM (including ours) suggests that the pragmatic (not the constitutive) aspects of language influence ToM understanding more significantly.

Yes, You Can? A Speaker’s Potency to Act upon His Words Orchestrates Early Neural Responses to Message-Level Meaning

“…There is also some evidence to suggest that the neural networks supporting ToM may be subject to modulation by linguistic factors (e.g. one’s native language; [18]). Nevertheless, the tightness of the neural link between language and ToM remains a controversial issue (for arguments in favor, see e.g.…”

“…that “pragmatic aspects of language affect ToM more than constitutive aspects [e.g. syntax and semantics]” [18]. In this view, language and social cognition are implemented in separable brain systems which do not rely on one another, but may ultimately interact in the realization of communicative goals.…”

How Does Language Influence Our Minds? From a Linguistics Perspective

“…In addition to the Language of Thought Hypothesis, Noam Chomsky's idea of Universal Grammar offers an alternative perspective on neurolinguistics to that of Sapir-Whorf [10][11][12]. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis highlights the significant influence of language in forming cognitive processes, whereas Chomsky's Universal Grammar theory concentrates on the universal and innate features of human language, leading to essentially divergent perspectives.…”

Kompetensi Makrostruktur Mahasiswa Unidha Dilihat Dari Fungsi Hemisfer Kanan

“…struktur meliputi pemaham an terhadap tema atau ide pokok sebuah teks, susunan Belakangan ini, kajian tentang makrocerita, kelengkapan cerita, keringkasan struktur mulai dilirik oleh ahli klinis yang cerita, hubungan logis antarbagian cerita mengaplikasikan aspek makrostruktur untuk melihat kemampuan komunikasi pada pasien yang mengalami cedera otak, seperti yang dilakukan oleh ahli terapi bahasa Myers (1993), Brookshire dan Nicholas (1993); Ryder, dkk. (2008), Kobayashi (2010), Wolfe (2010), Sastra (2011;2012), dan Handoko (2015). Hal ini dikarenakan makrosturktur berpotensi sebagai model untuk pemahaman dan produksi wacana atau teks yang meliputi aspek yang lebih kompleks seperti menyelesaikan masalah, memberi solusi, atau analisis kritis.…”