2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23156879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Explanations of Black Box Deep Learning Detectors on Simulated Aerial Drone Imagery

Abstract: Deep learning has become increasingly common in aerial imagery analysis. As its use continues to grow, it is crucial that we understand and can explain its behavior. One eXplainable AI (XAI) approach is to generate linguistic summarizations of data and/or models. However, the number of summaries can increase significantly with the number of data attributes, posing a challenge. Herein, we proposed a hierarchical approach for generating and evaluating linguistic statements of black box deep learning models. Our … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research conducted at the University of Missouri extensively leverages the UE across diverse areas of study. Notably, UE has played a pivotal role in our exploration of explainable AI, [12][13][14][15] procedural simulation for AI, [16][17][18] workflows enhancing computer vision, 17,[19][20][21][22][23] and multi-criteria decision making. 24,25 Additionally, UE has been instrumental in specific applications such as explosive hazard detection 14,18,26,27 and passive ranging.…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research conducted at the University of Missouri extensively leverages the UE across diverse areas of study. Notably, UE has played a pivotal role in our exploration of explainable AI, [12][13][14][15] procedural simulation for AI, [16][17][18] workflows enhancing computer vision, 17,[19][20][21][22][23] and multi-criteria decision making. 24,25 Additionally, UE has been instrumental in specific applications such as explosive hazard detection 14,18,26,27 and passive ranging.…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%