Linguistic metaconcepts can improve grammatical understanding in L1 education evidence from a Dutch quasi-experimental study

Abstract

This mixed-method quasi-experimental study examined whether metaconceptual grammar teaching impacts on (a) students’ L1 grammatical understanding, (b) their ‘blind’ use of grammatical concepts and (c) their preference of using explicit grammatical concepts over everyday concepts in explaining grammatical problems. Previous research, involving single group pre-postintervention designs, found positive effects for metaconceptual interventions on secondary school students’ grammatical reasoning ability, although a negative side effect seemed to be that some students started using grammatical concepts ‘blindly’ (i.e., in an inaccurate way). While there are thus important clues that metaconceptual grammar teaching may lead to increased grammatical understanding, there is a great need for more robust empirical research. The current study, involving 196 Dutch 14-year old pre-university students, is a methodological improvement of previous work, adopting a switching replications design. Bayesian multivariate analyses indicate medium to large effects from the metaconceptual intervention on students’ grammatical understanding. The study found a similar effect of the intervention on students’ ability to use explicit grammatical concepts over everyday concepts in tackling grammatical problems. No evidence for increased ‘blind’ concept use as a negative byproduct of the intervention was found. Additional qualitative analyses of in-intervention tasks provided further evidence for the effectiveness of metaconceptual interventions, and seemed to indicate that cases of blind concept use, rather than being a negative side effect, might actually be part of a gradual process of students’ growing understanding of grammatical (meta)concepts. We discuss these findings in relation to previous work and conclude that linguistic metaconcepts can improve L1 grammatical understanding.

"What's the Point of Learning Syntax?" Students' Motivation to Learn Syntax and Their Understanding of Its Functionality

“…The results show that teachers and learners agree that motivation is an important matter of concern, that the methodology used is correct, that the sentences they analyse syntactically are chosen by the teachers and that the teaching is mostly traditional, based on lectures at the blackboard with theoretical explanations of grammar and subsequent practice of exercises. This implies that both groups assume that it is necessary to work from knowledge of metalinguistic concepts (van Rijt et al, 2022). They explain that the teaching is not particularly innovative.…”

Learning how to think like a linguist: Linguistic reasoning as a focal point in L1 grammar education

“…Later studies, while limited in number, have shown that such approaches positively impact grammatical understanding (cf. Trotzke, 2023; Van Rijt et al., 2022), and suggest that a (meta)concept‐based approach might facilitate language comparisons across different languages taught at schools (Leenders et al., 2021; Rankin & Whong, 2020; Trotzke, 2023).…”

Førsteårs lærerstudenters forståelser og misforståelser av deskriptiv grammatikk

“…Internasjonalt ser man nå ei utvikling innenfor dette feltet i retning av utprøving av og forsking på kunnskapsbaserte grammatikkdidaktiske undervisningsmetoder (Wijnands et al, 2021;van Rijt et al, 2022b). Etter å ha framskaffet et empirisk solid fundament for å beskrive norske laererstudenters grammatikkkunnskap på det punktet de starter utdanninga, er vårt mål framover å bidra til kunnskap om laeringsfremmende måter å arbeide med dette fagstoffet på både i norsk skole og i laererutdanning.…”