Linguistically Diverse Children and Educators (Re)Forming Early Literacy Policy

Abstract

The current context of increased accountability and the proliferation of skills-based literacy mandates at the early childhood level pose particular tensions for multilingual children and educators. In this article, we draw on data from two ethnographic studies to examine how educators and children negotiate the constraints of early childhood curricular mandates within two New York City schools with multilingual populations and long traditions of attending to their linguistic, cultural, and social resources. Our data documents how educators sought to understand, grapple with, and (re)form early literacy policies to make spaces for student languages, collaboration, and inquiry. We found that young children distinguished between scripted practices and authentic literacy learning, and despite constraints found openings to bend the curriculum to suit their linguistic, intellectual, and social repertoires. The studies also emphasized the role of administrators and teachers in navigating-and mitigating-curricular mandates that were often contradictory to the bilingual missions and practices of their schools and at times conflicting and confusing in and of themselves. We argue that while policy is very much a participant in today's early literacy contexts, it is not deterministic. All members of the school community have an impact on mediating how policy is enacted and creating alternative opportunities for learning. The findings of these complementary studies illustrate how multilingual children and educators negotiated policy mandates in order to affirm the intellectual and cultural traditions of their schools.

Singing the Same Song: Engaging Families in Read Two Impress Plus

“…Creating space for children and families to read culturally and linguistically authentic and challenging texts is particularly important because our educational system privileges dominant languages, literacies, and cultures and are often “at odds with the ways that children make meaning in their lives outside of school” (Machado, 2017, p. 310). Engaging in these kinds of texts is also necessary because research shows that when readers are identified as “struggling,” they actually read fewer books and have less time to read and talk about books at school (Allington, 2014; Spencer et al, 2011).…”

“I believe in home language, but the tests don't”: Addressing Linguistic Diversity within Assessment Practices across Literacy Teacher Preparation and Classroom Practice

“…In a study of a dual-language program, researchers found that "the ideology [of language equality] functions by glossing over these differences through the processes of adequation" (Fitts, 2006, p. 349), often unwittingly leading students and teachers to recreate the status quo of English as the dominant language. Other studies have demonstrated the need to build teachers' capacity regarding how to promote literacy development with ELLs in ways that build on their linguistic practices (Spencer, Falchi, & Ghiso, 2011). Similarly, schools that work with students who speak what are deemed "nonacademic" or "nonstandardized" versions of English, such as AAVE, often face complex questions regarding when and how linguistic diversity is appreciated in the classroom (Chisholm & Godley, 2011;Wheeler, 2016).…”

Video conferencing and multimodal expression of voice: Children's conversations using Skype for second language development in a telecollaborative setting

“…That learning is achieved in communication between contemporaries and across generations is of particular significance in language development as language is both the medium for learning and the focus of study (Hauck and Youngs, 2008). Interacting in meaningful contexts that build on young language learners' lived experiences, home languages and cultural frameworks helps them to flourish as the potential for drawing on different meaning making resources is expanded (Spencer et al 2011).…”