2018
DOI: 10.1177/0022487118808785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistically Responsive Teaching in Preservice Teacher Education: A Review of the Literature Through the Lens of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory

Abstract: This article presents an integrated systematic review of scholarship related to preparing preservice teachers (PSTs) to teach multilingual learners in U.S. schools. We drew from cultural-historical activity theory to investigate how teacher educators who focus on preparing PSTs to work with multilingual students attended to the linguistically responsive teaching (LRT) framework. We identified three distinct activity systems, each linked to specific LRT dimensions. The ways in which the components of each activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on their comprehensive review of studies between 2000 and 2016 on mainstream preservice teacher preparation for ELLs, Villegas et al (2018) noted a striking finding that “virtually all of the studies focused strictly on what transpired within a single course in a single semester, little to nothing is known about the persistence of learning gains made in those courses over time” (p. 152). This finding was also corroborated in another review of studies on how teacher educators prepare preservice teachers to teach multilingual learners (see Solano-Campos et al, 2020). In the absence of a comprehensive view of mainstream preservice teachers’ experiences of learning to teach ELLs across their teacher education programs, it is likely that the same fragmented efforts and surface-level teacher education reform will continue to enact a pan-diversity approach to teacher learning that reproduces color-blind, culturally incompetent, and linguistically unskilled preservice teachers (Andrews et al, 2019).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Based on their comprehensive review of studies between 2000 and 2016 on mainstream preservice teacher preparation for ELLs, Villegas et al (2018) noted a striking finding that “virtually all of the studies focused strictly on what transpired within a single course in a single semester, little to nothing is known about the persistence of learning gains made in those courses over time” (p. 152). This finding was also corroborated in another review of studies on how teacher educators prepare preservice teachers to teach multilingual learners (see Solano-Campos et al, 2020). In the absence of a comprehensive view of mainstream preservice teachers’ experiences of learning to teach ELLs across their teacher education programs, it is likely that the same fragmented efforts and surface-level teacher education reform will continue to enact a pan-diversity approach to teacher learning that reproduces color-blind, culturally incompetent, and linguistically unskilled preservice teachers (Andrews et al, 2019).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Similar trends are reflected in research specific to emergent bilingual teacher education, with numerous studies on teachers (see reviews by Solano-Campos et al, 2020;Viesca et al, 2019) but scant research on teacher educators themselves. According to Faltis and Valdés (2016), "We have no information at present on what teacher educators in all their roles understand about language and language diversity .…”
Section: Emergent Bilingual Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Teachers in all licensure areas should complete programs with confidence in their ability to support the holistic development of all children, including EBLs from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds. To accomplish this, teacher educators should analyze programs to determine whether and how candidates learn about EBLs and SEL, as well as develop repertoires of practice to discern and support EBLs’ well-being in classrooms (Solano-Campos et al, 2020). Candidates’ coursework should include explicitly defined opportunities to read, discuss, and explore social-emotional components of learning, both broadly for all students and specific to EBLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%