2016
DOI: 10.4172/2572-0791.1000119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Link between Mindfulness and Personality-Related Factors Including Empathy, Theory of Mind, Openness, Pro-social Behaviour and Suggestibility

Abstract: This research investigated a potential linkage between mindfulness and personality characteristics such as openness to experience, empathy (empathic concern and theory of mind), pro-social behaviour and suggestibility. A sample of 275 volunteers was recruited. A series of the research questionnaires and scales was employed to measure mindfulness, empathic concern, theory of mind (or perspective taking), pro-social behaviour (or altruism) and suggestibility. Based on the quartile scores, participants were divid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results related to mindfulness show that there is no statistically significant difference between the scores of women and men. This result is in concurrence with the studies in which the moderation role of gender is tested and no statistically significant difference was found (de la fuente‐anuncibay et al, 2020; Kaviani & Hatami, 2016). As a result, H1 is partially confirmed.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results related to mindfulness show that there is no statistically significant difference between the scores of women and men. This result is in concurrence with the studies in which the moderation role of gender is tested and no statistically significant difference was found (de la fuente‐anuncibay et al, 2020; Kaviani & Hatami, 2016). As a result, H1 is partially confirmed.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, there is an insufficient explanation about the role of gender in the relationship between these variables (Baron‐Cohen & Hammer, 1997; De la Fuente‐Anuncibay et al, 2020). Studies examining the role of gender on anxiety, mindfulness, and ToM are usually done by comparing the means of women and men (Baron‐Cohen & Hammer, 1997; Kaviani & Hatami, 2016). By these methods, however, the comparison based on gender could be performed only for a single variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the observe and describe facets of mindfulness are key aspects of an open personality (Hanley, 2016), which facilitate attunement with the present moment and thereby increase confidence in managing current experiences (Beddoe & Murphy, 2004) and openness to engaging with here-and-now and novel experiences. Perhaps a recursive relation exists between openness and mindfulness in which an open personality promotes mindfulness which, in turn, facilitates an openness to engage in a wider array of experiences (Kaviani & Hatami, 2016; van den Hurk et al., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not come as a surprise as we know from prior research that when suggestibility is used to predict other behavioral measures, it is typically used across categories of participants—in particular, by focusing on the comparison between low- and high-suggestibility participants so as to maximize the difference between the two conditions. This has been done before when analyzing SSS data (e.g., Donovan, 2020; Winter & Braw, 2022) and other related measures such as mindfulness (e.g., Kaviani & Hatami, 2016) or hypnotic suggestibility (Laurence & Perry, 1982; Shor & Orne, 1962).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The split between low suggestibility (first quartile), medium suggestibility (50% of the data), and high suggestibility (last quartile) used in our study was inspired by previous studies analyzing SSS data (e.g., Donovan, 2020; Winter & Braw, 2022) and other related measures such as mindfulness level (e.g., Kaviani & Hatami, 2016) or hypnotizability (Anlló et al, 2017; Laurence & Perry, 1982; Shor & Orne, 1962). The motivation of this approach is to compare the extremes of the distribution, as it is there where we expect the larger differences to emerge, while aggregating data across participants to minimize noise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%