Link decay in leading information science journals

Abstract

Web citations have become common in scholarly publications as the amount of online literature increases. Yet, such links are not persistent and many decay over time, causing accessibility problems for readers. The present study investigates the link decay phenomenon in three leading information science journals. Articles spanning a period of 7 years (1997-2003) were downloaded, and their links were extracted. From these, a measure of link decay, the half-life, was computed to be approximately 5 years, which compares favorably against other disciplines (1.4-4.8 years). The study also investigated types of link accessibility errors encountered as well as examined characteristics of links that may be associated with decay. It was found that approximately 31% of all citations were not accessible during the time of testing, and the majority of errors were due to missing content (HTTP Error Code 404). Citations from the edu domain were also found to have the highest failure rates of 36% when compared with other popular top-level domains. Results indicate that link decay is a problem that cannot be ignored, and implications for journal authors and readers are discussed.

Citation accuracy in environmental science journals

“…(Goh and Ng 2006) and categorized as uncheckable, rather than as an error. All percentages in the article from this point on refer to the searchable citations (100% = 2,650) ( Table 1).…”

Capturing the web at large: a critique of current web referencing practices

“…He concluded that during that time span, around 67% of the URLs -due to one reason or another -became inaccessible. Koehler's study was based on randomly selected websites, but inspired a range of subsequent investigations probing the extent of the problem within distinct research fields such as History [12], Information Science [13][14][15], Law [16][17] and Medicine [18][19][20]. Results vary according to the types of links investigated and the timespan of the study, but the conclusions are clear: Websites are updated at an increasing speed, and URLs are disturbingly unstable.…”

Recovery of vanished URLs: Comparing the efficiency of Internet Archive and Google

“…The studies on web citation analysis in the past have witnessed the most frequent use of URLs (Casserly and Bird 2003;Spinellis 2003;Sellitto 2005;Maharana, Nayak, and Sahu 2006;Falagas, Karveli and Tritsaroli 2008;Goh and Ng 2007;and Moghaddam and Saberi 2011;Sampath Kumar and Manoj Kuma, 2012;Gul, Mahaj and Ali 2014). Studies focused on web resources have witnessed the loss of URLs.…”

“…The websites those are inherent in the web reinforces the scholarly communication. Many studies documented that use of Internet for scholarly information has become inevitable (Falagas, Karveli and Tritsaroli 2008;Goh and Ng 2007;Yang, Qiu and Xiong 2010).…”