2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2008.01.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Link quality prediction in mesh networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, nodes are capable of taking signal strength measures from other nodes on their own. This parameter is more valuable than determining actual location of the other nodes, as it more directly represents the potential for successful communication, as noted in [6]. This paper proposes a link quality prediction technique for wireless networks.…”
Section: Link Quality Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, nodes are capable of taking signal strength measures from other nodes on their own. This parameter is more valuable than determining actual location of the other nodes, as it more directly represents the potential for successful communication, as noted in [6]. This paper proposes a link quality prediction technique for wireless networks.…”
Section: Link Quality Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, link models typically reflect two approaches: physical models that use signal propagation to explain packet loss, and data-driven models that mathematically capture those effects with statistics like correlation between packet receptions. The former group includes distance-based attenuation, two-ray interference, and geometric occlusion models [11,12,13], while the latter includes loss-rate and Markov-chain models that reproduce distributions of consecutive receptions [14,15,16]. Though physics-driven methods are intuitive, they require detailed environment-specific information as inputs.…”
Section: Predictive Link-state Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the model is too computationally intensive to be implemented on a wireless sensor node. Farakas et al [6] apply cross-correlation and a pattern matching algorithm to predict link quality variations. The combined computation cost of correlation and pattern matching makes the technique likewise expensive.…”
Section: Mobility Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%