2013
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linkage between bacterial and fungal rhizosphere communities in hydrocarbon-contaminated soils is related to plant phylogeny

Abstract: Phytoremediation is an attractive alternative to excavating and chemically treating contaminated soils. Certain plants can directly bioremediate by sequestering and/or transforming pollutants, but plants may also enhance bioremediation by promoting contaminant-degrading microorganisms in soils. In this study, we used high-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes and the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region to compare the community composition of 66 soil samples from the rhizosphere of plant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
182
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
9
182
10
Order By: Relevance
“…2013; Bell et al. 2014). Multihost studies in temperate mixed forests also revealed positive correlations between host taxonomic distance and the distinctiveness of the EM communities they support (Ishida et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2013; Bell et al. 2014). Multihost studies in temperate mixed forests also revealed positive correlations between host taxonomic distance and the distinctiveness of the EM communities they support (Ishida et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013; Bell et al. 2014). Moreover, the few significant differences that we detected in both richness and community structure separated Picea mariana from the two Pinus species, reinforcing the idea that taxonomic relatedness is a key factor governing host effect and explaining variations in EM community composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Willow trees have several key advantages for phytoremediation when compared with other plants: they are genetically very diverse (400 species and over 200 hybrids, Newsholme, 2003), some species can be harvested frequently by coppicing, they are pioneer plants that have invasive growth strategies and very effective nutrient uptake systems, they grow fast and have high evapotranspiration rates and high productivity (Pulford and Watson, 2003). Although several studies have assessed the microbial communities associated with willows growing in contaminated soils (Leigh et al, 2006;de Carcer et al, 2007a,b;Kuffner et al, 2008;Hrynkiewicz et al, 2009;Zimmer et al, 2009;Weyens et al, 2013;Bell et al, 2014), the details of willow interactions with microbes are still not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of a direct response, there is little evidence suggesting similar organic contaminates are often absorbed and mobilized to above-ground tissue (Alkio et al, 2005;Watts et al, 2006;El Amrani et al, 2015;Shiri et al, 2015) or metabolized to any degree by willow directly. There is, however, a growing body of evidence pertaining to metaorganismal interactions whereby a multitude of organisms collectively exploit these unique environmental conditions (Weyens et al, 2009;Kang et al, 2012;Bell et al, 2014a;Yergeau et al, 2014;Gonzalez et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence, such as the seemingly ubiquitous presence of mites in human epidermis (Thoemmes et al, 2014), opens a door toward a relatively unexplored, more inclusive strategy indicating the value of an organism-blind approach to interpretation of RNAseq data. This is particularly important for phytoremediation tree systems where rhizospheric bacteria and fungi, as hypothesized from expression profiles, seem essential to understanding organic contamination tolerance (Bell et al, 2014a;Yergeau et al, 2014). Above ground, less research has been conducted with a metaorganismal approach in trees, although endophytes have been demonstrated interacting within the system (Doty et al, 2005;Kang et al, 2012;Khan et al, 2014;Delhomme et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%