The dication complex trans(O,S)-[Ru(bpy)(dmso-O) 2 (dmso-S) 2 ](OTf ) 2 [1·(OTf ) 2 ; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl; dmso = dimethyl sulfoxide; OTf -= CF 3 SO 3 -] was obtained from the reaction of cis(Cl),cis(S)-[RuCl 2 (bpy)(dmso-S) 2 ] with Ag(OTf ) in DMSO. The crystal structure of 1·(OTf ) 2 revealed two labile dmso-O ligands and two less-labile dmso-S ligands positioned cis to each other. In DMSO, the equatorial dmso-O in 1 2+ equilibrates with its linkage isomer dmso-S to fac(S)-[Ru(bpy)(dmso-O)(dmso-S) 3 ] 2+ [1 iso 2+ ] ([1 iso 2+ ]/[1 2+ ] = 3:97 at 298 K and 33:67
IntroductionBecause of their unique photophysical and photochemical properties, polypyridyl ruthenium(II) complexes have found many applications in the fields of supramolecular, bio-inorganic, and catalytic chemistry. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Although many heteroleptic polypyridyl ruthenium(II) complexes have been synthesized and investigated, most are of the [Ru(N-N) 2 (N′-N′)] 2+ type, in which N-N and N′-N′ are bidentate ligands such as 2,2′-bipyridyl (bpy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), or their analogues. [15,16] The limited range of target complexes is related to the easy synthetic access to cis-[RuCl 2 (bpy) 2 ] (commercially available) and its analogue complexes. On the other hand, tris-heteroleptic ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(N-N)(N′-N′)(N′′-N′′)] 2+ (N′′-N′′ = third bidentate ligand) are less common than [Ru(N-N) 2 (N′-N′)] 2+ , because there are no easy and useful synthetic routes to cisbis-heteroleptic polypyridyl Ru II complexes, cis-[Ru(L) 2 (N-N)-(N′-N′)] n+ (L = monodentate ligand, n = 0-2), and moreover, there are no convenient mono(N-N)Ru II complexes, [Ru(L) 4 -(N-N)] n+ , to serve as precursors for the bis-heteroleptic polypyridyl Ru II complexes.Carbonyl-based Ru II complexes such as trans(Cl)-[RuCl 2 -(N-N)(CO) 2 ] have been used as starting materials for the prepa- [a]