“…Electrically conductive metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) offer a way to bridge this gap, as they are molecularly defined and are both intrinsically porous and conductive . They are fundamentally distinct from electrocatalysts made from sacrificial MOF precursors (such as single-atom catalysts accessed via thermolysis or electrolytic degradation of MOFs), because they retain their molecular definition. ,,,,− As such, the structure space available to conductive MOFs renders them an ideal platform to tune the atomic structure for performance. We and others have previously shown that a family of 2D MOFs with the general formula M 3 (HITP) 2 (HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene, M = Co, Cu, Ni) (Figure A) are active for the O 2 electroreduction reaction (ORR), a transformation central to H 2 O 2 electrosynthesis, metal/air batteries, and fuel cells. ,, These and other conductive MOFs typically exhibit intrinsic surface areas (∼300–900 m 2 g –1 ) at least 10 times larger than that of dense metallic nanoparticles and conductivities comparable to that of graphite, yet their geometric current densities for ORR rarely exceed −1 mA cm –2 , implying a surprisingly low intrinsic electrocatalytic activity. ,,,,− …”