2012
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking community size structure and ecosystem functioning using metabolic theory

Abstract: Understanding how biogeochemical cycles relate to the structure of ecological communities is a central research question in ecology. Here we approach this problem by focusing on body size, which is an easily measured species trait that has a pervasive influence on multiple aspects of community structure and ecosystem functioning. We test the predictions of a model derived from metabolic theory using data on ecosystem metabolism and community size structure. These data were collected as part of an aquatic mesoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
90
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…negative effects on both benthic and pelagic primary producer biomass [17,24,50]. We did not measure DO in the tanks with sufficient frequency to estimate the magnitudes of ecosystem respiration or gross primary production, therefore we are unable to test the expectation that respiration responds more strongly to warming than production [17,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…negative effects on both benthic and pelagic primary producer biomass [17,24,50]. We did not measure DO in the tanks with sufficient frequency to estimate the magnitudes of ecosystem respiration or gross primary production, therefore we are unable to test the expectation that respiration responds more strongly to warming than production [17,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this suggests that warming may have profound consequences for ecosystem functioning prior to extinctions [14]. In the same vein, an aquatic mesocosm experiment demonstrated that long-term changes in the size structure had knock-on effects on community metabolism and biogeochemical fluxes that were stronger than the direct consequences of warming [9].…”
Section: Warming and Top-down Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theme issue integrates novel approaches for addressing the consequences of climate change in complex, sizestructured ecosystems. This includes the development of novel concepts [7][8][9][10], model analyses [11][12][13] and empirical studies in marine [14,15], freshwater [16,17] and terrestrial ecosystems [18][19][20][21][22]. In the following, we will introduce the framework of this theme issue by describing the complexity and the size structure of natural communities and how they might interact with climate change in determining top-down or bottom-up control, community stability and spatial processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). The availability of fine and coarse scale structural complexity often varies among habitats, with direct implications for the distribution of organisms 7, 8 , the maintenance of ecosystem processes 9, 10 , and the resilience of communities 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%