2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking crop structure, throughfall, soil surface conditions, runoff and soil detachment: 10 land uses analyzed in Northern Laos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
10
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in recent years, acid-tolerant cash crops (e.g., corn, cassava) have been introduced in these areas [29], resulting in the loss of forest area at the annual rate of about 0.4%, according to [30]. Government incentives to limit shifting cultivation have led to an increase of teak, rubber, and biofuel tree plantations in many parts of the basin [31]. In the lowland areas of the Khorat Plateau, Tonle Sap sub-basin, and central to southern parts of Lao PDR, the availability of fertile soil allows a permanent form of agriculture.…”
Section: Study Area Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in recent years, acid-tolerant cash crops (e.g., corn, cassava) have been introduced in these areas [29], resulting in the loss of forest area at the annual rate of about 0.4%, according to [30]. Government incentives to limit shifting cultivation have led to an increase of teak, rubber, and biofuel tree plantations in many parts of the basin [31]. In the lowland areas of the Khorat Plateau, Tonle Sap sub-basin, and central to southern parts of Lao PDR, the availability of fertile soil allows a permanent form of agriculture.…”
Section: Study Area Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shifting cultivation practices cause erosion (i.e., approximately 5.7 Mg/ha/year of topsoil are lost during cultivation, and about 0.7 Mg/ha/year during fallow years, according to [12], though they are not the only land use practice to be blamed for soil erosion in the LMB. Incentives for eliminating shifting cultivation (see Section 2.1) have led to a conversion of upland rice areas to tears, mazes, and tree plantations (teak, rubber, palm trees) [31,49,56]. Changes from upland rice to mazes and job's tears, for example, have been found to almost double the rate of sediment production, from about 6 to about 11 Mg/ha/year [12].…”
Section: Land Management Influencing Tss and Nitrate Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have reported the quantitative relationships between soil loss and rainfall and vegetation cover using various modeling approaches, such as regression, conceptual, and physics-based models (de Vente & Poesen, 2005), using observations made at microplots (less than 10 m 2 ; e.g., Ha et al, 2012;Lacombe et al, 2018) and/or rainfall simulation experiments (Ollobarren Del Barrio, Giménez, & Campo-Bescós, 2017). The low data requirement, small number of variables, and extrapolation to the same region increase the applicability of regression models on annual erosion at the slope scale, though the process dynamics are not precisely presented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to simulating hydrology, soil, and bacteria, first, Lacombe et al (2017) and Ribolzi et al (2017) found that the teak plantation increased the amount of surface runoff because the raindrops, which are stored on the surface of the broad leaves of these tall trees, could fall with higher kinetic energy. Therefore, we suggest further development of the hydrology submodule of SWAT to simulate the effect of the kinetic energy of raindrops falling from the canopy on soil erosion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fate and transport of FIB are influenced by the environment, including climate, hydrology, pollution, topography, soil type, and land use (Boithias et al, 2016; Cho et al, 2016; Coffey et al, 2016; Rochelle‐Newall et al, 2016). Land use change is thought to be influential in FIB transfers due to alteration in hydrology and erosion processes in watersheds (Lacombe et al, 2017; Ribolzi et al, 2017; Valentin et al, 2008), which consequently influence the export of bacteria. Nevertheless, most studies have focused on the transport of bacteria in streams rather than the impact of land use on FIB due to the complexity and heterogeneity of land uses in watersheds (Liang et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%