2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking desorption kinetics to phenanthrene biodegradation in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimise solvent effects, the antibiotic solutions were first added to 25% of the soil and allowed to vent totally (to avoid potential effect of MeOH) before mixing well with the remaining soil (i.e. 75% of the soil) following the procedure in previous study [30]. Blank soil that was not augmented with antibiotics, but treated with the same amount of pure MeOH, was also prepared following the same procedure.…”
Section: Soil Sample and Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimise solvent effects, the antibiotic solutions were first added to 25% of the soil and allowed to vent totally (to avoid potential effect of MeOH) before mixing well with the remaining soil (i.e. 75% of the soil) following the procedure in previous study [30]. Blank soil that was not augmented with antibiotics, but treated with the same amount of pure MeOH, was also prepared following the same procedure.…”
Section: Soil Sample and Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desorption should also be considered when assessing the contaminant release riskor examining sorbent utility. Currently, desorption techniques are increasingly and widely applied to feasible studies of sorbents such as Tenax TA, XAD resin and hydroxypropyl-b-cyclodextrin (Xu et al, 2008;Rhodes et al, 2010;Sandhu and Gu, 2013). These porous polymers can act as a sink for HOCs that are desorbing from sorbents where the aqueous concentration remains at zero (Pignatello, 1990) and where the desorption distribution and binding limits can be realized (You et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different soil types were amended with AChar between 0.1% and 5% concentrations, where increase in concentrations of AChar resulted in a 7.8-fold decrease in rapidly desorbed fraction (%F rap ) and corresponding decrease in (slow desorbed fraction) %F slow . Similarly, as the soil-PAH contact time increased, the %F rap , which represents labile fractions of the compound [38] decreased due to strong pore sorption. The pore sites within such black carbons prove to be impervious to aqueous-based extraction solutions [129] and variations in soil physicochemical properties showed no effect on phenanthrene desorption in AChar-amended soils.…”
Section: Desorption Mechanism Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although HOCs undergo sorption within the SOM matrix, they are subject to potential release from the reversible sorption sites to become bioavailable, or organisms migrate towards the compounds [37,38]. The total HOC content in soils does not always provide valid information on the potential biodegradable or ecotoxicologically relevant fractions and environmental risk [29,39].…”
Section: Definitions Of Bioavailability Bioaccessibility and Chemicamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation