2005
DOI: 10.3354/meps286099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking foraging strategies of marine calanoid copepods to patterns of nitrogen stable isotope signatures in a mesocosm study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we cannot rule out other explanations at present, the pattern observed looked like a strong imprint of zooplankton grazing at higher temperatures. It has been shown in summer experiments that copepod grazing primarily reduces large phytoplankton, while small phytoplankton is at times even favoured, because they are released from ciliate grazing pressure (Feuchtmayr 2004;Grané li and Turner 2002;Sommer et al 2003aSommer et al , b, 2005a. Contrary to summer conditions, when ciliates preferentially feed on small phytoplankton (Sommer et al 2005b), the ciliates in our experiment had also fed on large algae (Aberle et al 2006), which is quite typical for the start of the seasonal growth cycle (Montagnes et al 1988).…”
Section: Succession Patternsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…While we cannot rule out other explanations at present, the pattern observed looked like a strong imprint of zooplankton grazing at higher temperatures. It has been shown in summer experiments that copepod grazing primarily reduces large phytoplankton, while small phytoplankton is at times even favoured, because they are released from ciliate grazing pressure (Feuchtmayr 2004;Grané li and Turner 2002;Sommer et al 2003aSommer et al , b, 2005a. Contrary to summer conditions, when ciliates preferentially feed on small phytoplankton (Sommer et al 2005b), the ciliates in our experiment had also fed on large algae (Aberle et al 2006), which is quite typical for the start of the seasonal growth cycle (Montagnes et al 1988).…”
Section: Succession Patternsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For example, to overcome nonlinear feeding responses due to food saturating conditions, a modified protocol can be used (Paterson et al 2008; this study). To prevent nutrient limiting conditions in the experimental vessels, often dialysis bags are incubated in situ (Landry 1993;Sommer et al 2005a, b;Aberle et al 2007) or nutrients are added in excess to the dilution series (Landry 1993;Fonda Umani et al 2005;First et al 2009) in bottle incubations. As we wanted to keep conditions in microzooplankton und copepod grazing experiments comparable, we chose the second alternative (bottle incubations), that was also necessary for correction of trophic cascade effects in the copepod grazing set-up (Nejstgaard et al 1997(Nejstgaard et al , 2001Fonda Umani et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of microzooplankton grazing pressure can promote nanoflagellates, an important prey of ciliates, and thus affect bacterial abundance negatively as bacteria are the main food source of nanoflagellates (Zöllner et al 2009). Even more pronounced effects were reported for chlorophyll a concentrations: copepod grazers reduced microzooplankton biomass and led to overall higher chlorophyll a concentrations due to the release of small sized flagellates from microzooplankton grazing (Sommer et al 2003(Sommer et al , 2005a.…”
Section: Microzooplankton and T Longicornis Grazing Impact On The Phmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…), autotrophic picoplankton, dinoflagellates (e.g., Gymnodinium sp., Prorocentrum sp. ), and nanoflagellates (Sommer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mimicked the natural nutrient input by manually adding nutrient to the enclosed mesocosms, using nitrogen concentrations that compensated for the loss of N caused by sedimentation and Redfield ratios for phosphorus and silicon additions as described in previous studies (Sommer et al, 2005;Olsen et al, 2006). Such nutrients additions maintained the low natural phytoplankton concentrations yet avoided accumulation of unrealistically high concentrations of phytoplankton biomass (Børsheim et al, 2005).…”
Section: Mesocosmsmentioning
confidence: 99%