2002
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2002.9728957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking international business theory to accounting history: implications of the international evolution of the state and the firm for accounting history research

Abstract: Accounting is an interdisciplinary subject. We routinely draw insights and models from the base disciplines (e.g. economics, psychology etc.) as a starting point for research on accounting issues. As accounting researchers, and accounting historians in particular, explore the international dimensions of accounting it is appropriate. therefore, to look to the literature on international relations for insights. This paper provides examples of how we could use the literature on the nation-state and international … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Richardson and MacDonald (2002) also addressed the comparative dimensions of accounting history research by linking international business history to accounting history.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richardson and MacDonald (2002) also addressed the comparative dimensions of accounting history research by linking international business history to accounting history.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on treaty organizations and relations among nations in this article responds to Richardson and MacDonald’s (2002) call to link accounting history to international business theory (cf. Carmona et al, 2010; Carnegie and Napier, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zan, 1994;Zambon, 1995;Tyson, 1998). In the American case, while it Carnegie and Napier, 2002; Richardson and appears that a distinctive form of managerialism MacDonald, 2002), yet here looking almost two was developed from around 1850 along the lines centuries earlier, one discovers a particularly visuggested by Chandler (1977, 19861, with the 'in-sionary set of accounting and management innovavisible hand' of the market displaced by the 'visi-tions being either proposed or introduced in the ble hand' of management, serious questions Venice Arsenal, with at least three major elements remain about the provenance of the new manage-of interest. rial world (e.g., Macve, 1988, 1994).…”
Section: The Venice Arsenal In Accounting History: An European Focus?mentioning
confidence: 93%