2015
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking macrotrends and microrates: Re-evaluating microevolutionary support for Cope's rule

Abstract: 1Cope's rule, wherein a lineage increases in body size through time, was originally 2 motivated by macro-evolutionary patterns observed in the fossil record. More recently, some 3 authors have argued that evidence exists for generally positive selection on individual body size 4 in contemporary populations, providing a micro-evolutionary mechanism for Cope's rule. If 5 larger body size confers individual fitness advantages as the selection estimates suggest, thereby 6 explaining Cope's rule, then body size sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(155 reference statements)
2
66
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All things considered, our results do not contradict the finding that there is little detectable selective advantage of size increase in contemporary populations (Gotanda et al. ). However, they do suggest that any microevolutionary processes cannot easily be extrapolated to macroevolutionary patterns without knowing more about detailed selective and/or “passive” mechanisms of evolution at different time scales.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…All things considered, our results do not contradict the finding that there is little detectable selective advantage of size increase in contemporary populations (Gotanda et al. ). However, they do suggest that any microevolutionary processes cannot easily be extrapolated to macroevolutionary patterns without knowing more about detailed selective and/or “passive” mechanisms of evolution at different time scales.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Using generalized linear mixed-effect models (GLMMs), in an information-theoretic framework to enforce parsimony and acknowledge model uncertainty, we analyzed a modified and georeferenced version of a database of rates of phenotypic change that has been developed over two decades (5,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). After a series of quality filters, we retained for analyses 89 studies targeting 155 species, 175 study systems, and >1,600 rates of phenotypic change ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We improved an existing database on rates of phenotypic change (5,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). We added new data published up to August of 2015.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of this study was proof of such principle, to help offset especially recent criticism that studies of phenotypic selection do not directly assess evolutionary responses and can therefore be misleading (Kingsolver and Pfennig ; Merilä and Hendry ; Gotanda et al. ). My approach addresses and likely deflects at least two potential reasons for lacking responses to selection in the wild: that the genetic response is present but masked by a changing environment, and/or that selection acts primarily on the environmental rather than the genetic component (Merilä et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…), rendering evolutionary interpretations based on selection estimates and those based on population responses discordant (Gotanda et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%