2013
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2012.748869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking peers, patients, and providers: A qualitative study of a peer integration program for hard-to-reach patients living with HIV/AIDS

Abstract: For HIV-positive individuals living in socially vulnerable circumstances, the complexities of accessing and navigating healthcare system can be overwhelming. Peer-driven interventions (PDIs) are increasingly being recognized as effective ways of addressing barriers to HIV care in the USA. The present study is a qualitative investigation of barriers, challenges, and facilitators to implementation of a peer integration program at three health centers in the USA. Findings reveal that health center staff and HIV-p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study’s positive results with connection to ACT services aligns with other studies that found improved care engagement as a result of a peer intervention 40 43 44. Qualitatively, this study’s participants expressed views similar to other peer intervention studies regarding the ease of speaking with a peer and the benefit of shared experience 19 45 46. However, this study found that PVs and participants were able to connect despite differences in age, health status and other demographics, which differs from other studies that recommend peers share as many subgroup characteristics as possible 45 47…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This study’s positive results with connection to ACT services aligns with other studies that found improved care engagement as a result of a peer intervention 40 43 44. Qualitatively, this study’s participants expressed views similar to other peer intervention studies regarding the ease of speaking with a peer and the benefit of shared experience 19 45 46. However, this study found that PVs and participants were able to connect despite differences in age, health status and other demographics, which differs from other studies that recommend peers share as many subgroup characteristics as possible 45 47…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The first suggests that the emotional and social support provided by the peer may lead to reductions in symptoms of distress caused by an HIV diagnosis and/or to acceptance of the need for long-term healthcare. The connection formed around the shared experience of peers who are living with HIV may have beneficial impacts on health and well-being (23,24). Secondly there may be reductions in internalized stigma, whereby the PLHA witnesses firsthand, through interaction with a designated peer, how HIV is not necessarily a “death sentence,” but can be a chronic, manageable condition when appropriately engaging with care and treatment (25,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a closer look at the subset of newly diagnosed individuals is of particular interest, as this group may serve as a bridge to category “individuals not tested,” commonly described as “hard-to-reach” populations [ 34 , 69 75 ]. Remarkably, more than 30% of individuals tested for HIV during the enhanced HBHTC were tested for the first time, suggesting that HBHTC could be an efficient tool for reaching individuals who have never been tested previously in southern African communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%