2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking PFAS partitioning behavior in sewage solids to the solid characteristics, solution chemistry, and treatment processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, existing cations in wastewater may provide the required ion bridges for the sorption of negatively charged PFAS. For example, PFAS sorption to the sludge (biosolids) increased with higher cation concentrations and it was greater in the presence of divalent cations compared to monovalent cations (Ebrahimi et al 2021). This could be ascribed to electrostatic interaction between a divalent cation and the anionic PFAS head group, as well as with a negative charge on the sludge.…”
Section: The Occurrence Of Pfas In Industrial Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, existing cations in wastewater may provide the required ion bridges for the sorption of negatively charged PFAS. For example, PFAS sorption to the sludge (biosolids) increased with higher cation concentrations and it was greater in the presence of divalent cations compared to monovalent cations (Ebrahimi et al 2021). This could be ascribed to electrostatic interaction between a divalent cation and the anionic PFAS head group, as well as with a negative charge on the sludge.…”
Section: The Occurrence Of Pfas In Industrial Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the main exposure routes to PFAS is by wastewater effluents [ 1 ] from industries manufacturing them or from municipal wastewater impacted by PFAS-related products. As PFAS are not easily removed by conventional biological wastewater treatment processes such as activated sludge [ 8 ], effluents were shown to contain varying PFAS species which could contaminate the aquatic environment. In the US, wastewater effluents were shown to contain ƩPFAS 29 : 20–4773 ng/L (from 29 PFAS species) in North Carolina [ 9 ] and ƩPFAS 17 : 442–2234 ng/L in Nevada [ 10 ].…”
Section: Background On Pfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these three steps, extract cleanup appears to be the most variable step, with a wide variety of adsorbents having been employed alone or in combination, including graphitized non-porous carbon (which is more commonly known under the trademark name ENVI-Carb), bare silica, octadecylfunctionalized silica (C18), primary and secondary aminefunctionalized silica (PSA), weak anion exchange (WAX) polymeric resin, and hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) polymeric resin. 20,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] In what appears to have been the first study investigating the occurrence of perfluoro carboxylates and sulfonates in digested sludges, Higgins et al developed a method that involved extracting sludge samples with an acidic methanol solvent and cleaning up the extract using a C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge. 34 The method developed by Higgins et al was adopted by several other researchers, 25,[41][42][43][44] including Moodie et al, who used C18 together with PSA in the extract cleanup step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%