2017
DOI: 10.1080/14479338.2017.1358101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking the firm’s knowledge network and subsequent exploratory innovation: a study based on semiconductor industry patent data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, regarding the merging parties' knowledge elements as network nodes (Vaccario et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2014;Guan and Liu, 2016), some scholars have indicated that recombing pre-M&A technology areas of the merging parties will lead to reconstruction of the combined firm's internal knowledge network (Yoon et al, 2017;Shin et al, 2017). Acquirers' knowledge bases can be expanded over time by acquiring and leveraging targets' knowledge resources (Yoon et al, 2017;Choi and McNamara, 2018). Acquisitions can also help firms learn architectural knowledge to understand interdependencies between different knowledge domains and recombine them (Yayavaram et al, 2018;Carnabuci and Operti, 2013).…”
Section: Influence Of Change In Internal Knowledge Network Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, regarding the merging parties' knowledge elements as network nodes (Vaccario et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2014;Guan and Liu, 2016), some scholars have indicated that recombing pre-M&A technology areas of the merging parties will lead to reconstruction of the combined firm's internal knowledge network (Yoon et al, 2017;Shin et al, 2017). Acquirers' knowledge bases can be expanded over time by acquiring and leveraging targets' knowledge resources (Yoon et al, 2017;Choi and McNamara, 2018). Acquisitions can also help firms learn architectural knowledge to understand interdependencies between different knowledge domains and recombine them (Yayavaram et al, 2018;Carnabuci and Operti, 2013).…”
Section: Influence Of Change In Internal Knowledge Network Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have considered firms to be doubly embedded, in one network formed by firms' collaboration relationships and in another composed of linkages between knowledge elements (Wang et al, 2014;Guan and Liu, 2016;Brennecke and Rank, 2017). A firm's internal knowledge network can be thought of as a set of knowledge elements (Shin et al, 2017;Yoon et al, 2017). The inter-connection between them leads to new combinations based on the existing knowledge stock or new knowledge domains (Guan and Liu, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, patents can be considered proxies of innovation (Watanabe et al, 2001). According to the work of Yoon et al (2017) patents can be considered as a container of knowledge elements, while Phelps et al (2012) call them "discrete knowledge artefacts," alongside papers and products.…”
Section: Patents As a Basis For Studying Knowledge Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the future flow of knowledge is explored by predicting the co-contribution of patents to future inventions, where patents are considered knowledge containers (Yoon et al, 2017). A link prediction algorithm is chosen and applied to a patent co-citation network with the goal of predicting future patent co-citations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisations and organisational scholars are particularly interested in the role of online knowledge flows. This is because knowledge and knowledge sharing are key to bringing about innovation in organisations (Kim & Chung, 2017;Nambisan et al, 2017;Yoon et al, 2017), which many organisations consider to be at the core of their business model and strategies. The creation and diffusion of knowledge in organisations is an important theme in organisational research (Baralou & Tsoukas, 2015;Cross et al, 2001;Haas & Hansen, 2007;Hansen et al, 2005;Kane et al, 2014;Lee & Cole, 2003;Nonaka, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%