2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking vegetation and soil functions during secondary forest succession in the Atlantic forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
4
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Decomposition rates were correlated with the first axis of forest structure (Veg 1), which was represented by areas with higher tree density, mean DBH, and basal area. Forests with more developed canopies and higher tree densities present higher primary production and produce higher amounts of leaf litter (Teixeira et al 2020). The additional leaf litter produced increases the amounts of available resources for decomposers, which can positively influence their activity (Nunes and Pinto 2007;Silva-Sánchez et al 2019), rising decomposition rates (Lajtha et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposition rates were correlated with the first axis of forest structure (Veg 1), which was represented by areas with higher tree density, mean DBH, and basal area. Forests with more developed canopies and higher tree densities present higher primary production and produce higher amounts of leaf litter (Teixeira et al 2020). The additional leaf litter produced increases the amounts of available resources for decomposers, which can positively influence their activity (Nunes and Pinto 2007;Silva-Sánchez et al 2019), rising decomposition rates (Lajtha et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riparian forests, which have important hydrological functions (MANDER; HAYAKAWA; KUUSEMETS, 2005;PRIMO;VAZ, 2006;BREN, 1993;BARRELLA et al, 2000) in controlling margin erosion (FARIA;MARQUES, 1999) and filtering occasional chemical residues, such as fertilizers and agrochemical in production areas (PEREIRA & PEREIRA, 2010;BARTON;DAVIES, 1993;MANDER;HAYAKAWA;KUUSEMETS, 2005), have been suffering anthropic influence since then, with no care at all for their conservation, as they were always considered an inexhaustible source due to their abundance; this has resulted in their fragmentation (MARTINS, 2007). Conservation efforts in this kind of areas are so important and should consider secondary forest succession as an efficient and viable strategy to increase forest cover and enhance biodiversity conservation (TEIXEIRA et. Al, 2020), especially in the South of Brazil where there are many farmers and land owners can play a key role for successfully increasing forest cover (UNIVATES, 2011).…”
Section: Taquari River Valleymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This land capacity reduction may be due to the cultivation of monoculture crops (e.g., rubber, palm oil, coffee), which leads to substantial changes in soil processes and properties that can result in a complete or partial loss of productive capacity [12][13][14]. Substantial changes in soil processes and properties can also be driven by structural changes to the covering vegetation [15]. While some studies reported the negative impacts of rubber farming on soil properties [12,[16][17][18] other studies reported that the soil properties of rubber plantations were similar to those of natural forests in that only minimal nutrient loss was observed as a consequence of rubber plantation processes [4,16,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%