Linking young individuals' capital to investment intentions: Comparing two cultural backgrounds

Abstract

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints-eprint.ncl.ac.uk Palamida E, Papagiannidis S, Xanthopoulou D. Linking young individuals' capital to investment intentions: Comparing two cultural backgrounds.

Structural empowerment, psychological empowerment, and work engagement: A cross-country study

“…Although these countries share some work features such as high work intensity and supportive social relationships, they differ in the levels of job insecurity (higher in Spain) and skill variety (higher in the UK; Eurofound, 2017). Also, in terms of cultural characteristics, Spain is considered a more collectivistic country than the UK (Hofstede, 2001), suggesting that social bonds are stronger in Spain (Palamida, Papagiannidis, & Xanthopoulou, 2018). Since structural empowerment concerns social structures, while psychological empowerment puts the emphasis on the individual, it is relevant to investigate whether their role for work engagement is similar in countries that vary in terms of social norms.…”

Exploring Factors Influencing Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention in Vocational Colleges Based on Structural Equation Modeling: Evidence From China

“…Among notable research studies, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) has been widely employed because of its powerful explanatory and predictive power. On the basis of Theory of Planned Behavior, researchers have added other theoretical perspectives (such as social cognition theory, self-efficacy theory, and emotional intelligence perspective) to adjust Theory of Planned Behavior model to adapt to distinctive economic and cultural backgrounds ( Palamida et al, 2018 ; Mozahem and Adlouni, 2021 ; Otache et al, 2021 ). However, in China, such research are insufficient.…”

The Change of Investment Behavior during Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Stock Market

“…In terms of the theoretical gap, the previous study used 5 variables, attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, behavioral intention, and actual behavior [7]; while this research used 6 variables by adding up one new variable, perceived risk. In terms of the methodological gap, the previous research was using multigroup CFA to analyze the research variables [5] and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) [7]; while this research used a paired t-test analysis to compare the data of investment behavior before and during Covid-19. In terms of empirical gap, the previous studies were done in the UK and Greece [5], and in India [7]; while this research was done in Indonesia.…”

“…In terms of the methodological gap, the previous research was using multigroup CFA to analyze the research variables [5] and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) [7]; while this research used a paired t-test analysis to compare the data of investment behavior before and during Covid-19. In terms of empirical gap, the previous studies were done in the UK and Greece [5], and in India [7]; while this research was done in Indonesia.…”