2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Links between preschoolers' literacy interest, inattention, and emergent literacy skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Parenting is a highly cultural‐specific activity (Gutierrez & Rogoff, ; Rogoff et al, ), and research continues to show that there are many ways to raise children to become successful and productive members of society (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine, ; NRC, ). Although interest development in preschool has been linked to a number of positive developmental and academic outcomes in kindergarten and beyond (e.g., Fisher et al, ; Hume, Allan, & Lonigan, ; Leibham et al, ; Neitzel, Alexander, & Johnson, ), it may be that some parenting strategies that support science interest development are not as well suited for promoting other early childhood development outcomes, and vice versa, and that some strategies are appropriate in specific cultural contexts but not others. Furthermore, we recognize that the data in this study represent only brief snapshots of these families lives and do not acount for life circumstances, daily events, and other contextual factors that influenced how parents and children engaged during each of the research sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parenting is a highly cultural‐specific activity (Gutierrez & Rogoff, ; Rogoff et al, ), and research continues to show that there are many ways to raise children to become successful and productive members of society (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine, ; NRC, ). Although interest development in preschool has been linked to a number of positive developmental and academic outcomes in kindergarten and beyond (e.g., Fisher et al, ; Hume, Allan, & Lonigan, ; Leibham et al, ; Neitzel, Alexander, & Johnson, ), it may be that some parenting strategies that support science interest development are not as well suited for promoting other early childhood development outcomes, and vice versa, and that some strategies are appropriate in specific cultural contexts but not others. Furthermore, we recognize that the data in this study represent only brief snapshots of these families lives and do not acount for life circumstances, daily events, and other contextual factors that influenced how parents and children engaged during each of the research sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence on the relations between child interest in literacy and their home literacy environment is scarce. Based on a few reports that are available, child's interest has been found to be positively related to their home literacy environment (Martini and Sénéchal, 2012;Hume et al, 2016;Carroll et al, 2019). For instance, concurrent and longitudinal associations were found between exposure to book reading (e.g., the amount of children's books, shared reading, and children observing parent read) and children's interest in books, whereas parent teaching literacy (e.g., teaching letters, pointing out words, and playing rhyming games) was concurrently and longitudinally associated with children's interest in the alphabet and words (Hume et al, 2015).…”
Section: Children's Interest In Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since children at age 3 are not expected to read, the finding that children who independently engaged more frequently with text had stronger language skills is notable. Children who are interested in literacy usually spend more time interacting with text (Carroll et al, 2019; Morgan & Fuchs, 2007) as well as engage more actively in literacy‐related activities (Hume, Allan, & Lonigan, 2016), resulting in stronger language skills (Hume et al, 2016; Martini & Sénéchal, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%