2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019jg005095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Links of Extracellular Enzyme Activities, Microbial Metabolism, and Community Composition in the River‐Impacted Coastal Waters

Abstract: Extracellular enzymatic activity (EEA), production, respiration, and composition of the bacterial community were determined along environmental gradients in the river-impacted coastal waters in the South China Sea during summer in order to examine the links of EEA, metabolic activity, and composition of the bacterial community. The initial step of substrate utilization was coupled with metabolic activity of the bacterial community. The activity of leucine aminopeptidase was closely related to the level of phyt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of the extracellular enzymatic activities showed similarities and differences between sites, revealing potential changes in microbial organic matter processing as a response to different DOC sources and temperatures. In both the GBR and Red Sea the same order in the responses of the relative enzymatic activity to the altered conditions were found: LAPase > APase > BGase, which is consistent with patterns typically found in marine environments (Baltar et al., 2009, 2017; Lønborg et al., 2019; Nichols & Martin, 2021; Shi et al., 2019). Such relatively higher LAPase activity is commonly linked with the microbial use of organic matter for protein synthesis and increasing supply of leucine containing compounds (Kellogg & Deming, 2014; Piontek et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response of the extracellular enzymatic activities showed similarities and differences between sites, revealing potential changes in microbial organic matter processing as a response to different DOC sources and temperatures. In both the GBR and Red Sea the same order in the responses of the relative enzymatic activity to the altered conditions were found: LAPase > APase > BGase, which is consistent with patterns typically found in marine environments (Baltar et al., 2009, 2017; Lønborg et al., 2019; Nichols & Martin, 2021; Shi et al., 2019). Such relatively higher LAPase activity is commonly linked with the microbial use of organic matter for protein synthesis and increasing supply of leucine containing compounds (Kellogg & Deming, 2014; Piontek et al., 2014; Shi et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In both the GBR and Red Sea the same order in the responses of the relative enzymatic activity to the altered conditions were found: LAPase > APase > BGase, which is consistent with patterns typically found in marine environments (Baltar et al, 2009(Baltar et al, , 2017Lønborg et al, 2019;Nichols & Martin, 2021;Shi et al, 2019). Such relatively higher LAPase activity is commonly linked with the microbial use of organic matter for protein synthesis and increasing supply of leucine containing compounds (Kellogg & Deming, 2014;Piontek et al, 2014;Shi et al, 2019). The maximum EEA rates were generally lower in the Red Sea than in the GBR, suggesting that the response of EEA to different DOC sources will depend on the ambient microbial communities but also on the composition of the main DOC source (e.g., mangrove and seagrass species).…”
Section: Total Extracellular Enzymatic Activity (Eea) With Changing S...supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Conceptual framework of the RCA carbon system (RCACS), including the water column and sediment carbon cycles. The POC undergoes hydrolysis into DOC and then DOC remineralization into DIC is supported bySmith et al (1992),Anderson and Tang (2010),Shi et al (2019), andDruon et al (2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the inshore station (S1) was substrate‐rich and the offshore stations (S2 and S3) were substrate‐low. The river discharge delivered nutrients and triggered phytoplankton growth in the nearshore waters (e.g., S1) (Xu et al., 2018), potentially enhancing the supply of phytoplankton‐derived and high‐molecular‐weight DOC (Kirchman, 2002), which bacteria preferentially utilize (Shi et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2018). The offshore station S2 and S3 located at substrate‐low SCS, where low molecular weight DOC and less bioavailable bacteria and virus‐derived DOC were likely dominated (Dong et al., 2013; Shiah et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%