2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2008.13190
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liouville type theorems and periodic solutions for $χ^{(2)}$ type systems with non-homogeneous nonlinearities

Aleks Jevnikar,
Jun Wang,
Wen Yang

Abstract: In the present paper we derive Liouville type results and existence of periodic solutions for χ (2) type systems with non-homogeneous nonlinearities. Moreover, we prove both universal bounds as well as singularity and decay estimates for this class of problems. In this study, we have to face new difficulties due to the nonhomogenous nonlinearities. To overcome this issue, we carry out delicate integral estimates for this class of nonlinearities and modify the usual scaling and blow up arguments. This seems to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) The nonexistence of nontrivial solutions of (5.1) in the special case f (s) = s p +s 2 with 1 < p < p B and n ≤ 5 has been proved in [27] (where a class of systems is actually studied), by using the approach from [3]. However, we note that the nonlinearity is asymptotic to a power.…”
Section: Parabolic Liouville Type Theorems Without Scale Invariancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…(ii) The nonexistence of nontrivial solutions of (5.1) in the special case f (s) = s p +s 2 with 1 < p < p B and n ≤ 5 has been proved in [27] (where a class of systems is actually studied), by using the approach from [3]. However, we note that the nonlinearity is asymptotic to a power.…”
Section: Parabolic Liouville Type Theorems Without Scale Invariancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…(i) Sharpness of the assumptions. Observe that the "homogeneous" estimate (27) implies 7 the Liouville property in Q. Consequently (27) in particular fails whenever (8) admits a positive solution. In this respect we have the following useful counter-example.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Decay of bounded solutions. If one considers bounded solutions of ( 19) in an unbounded domain D and is only interested in the decay rates as |x| and/or |t| → ∞, then the assumptions on f for large s (namely s ≥ M = u ∞ ) are not needed, and estimate (27) remains true (with a constant C depending also on M ). 8 We also have an analogue of Theorem 4.1 for boundary value problems, for which we define the additional exponent p * * = n+1 n−1 in case (10) and p * * = 1 + 2 n+1 in case (11).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations