2014
DOI: 10.1177/0956797614542132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lip Reading Without Awareness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
23
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results add to the body of evidence showing that visual awareness during interocular competition is influenced by nonvisual information conveyed by other sensory modalities (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41). Our results go further, however, by demonstrating robust AV interaction based on high-level, symbolic representations, i.e., musical notation and melodic structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results add to the body of evidence showing that visual awareness during interocular competition is influenced by nonvisual information conveyed by other sensory modalities (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41). Our results go further, however, by demonstrating robust AV interaction based on high-level, symbolic representations, i.e., musical notation and melodic structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our results go further, however, by demonstrating robust AV interaction based on high-level, symbolic representations, i.e., musical notation and melodic structure. It is not surprising that this robust interaction is enjoyed only by individuals with expertise acquired through musical training, in contrast, for example, to the performance enhancement exhibited by virtually all people when listening to speech sounds while looking at lip movements (35,39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, posterior/central beta power is reduced when goal-dependent scrutiny that imposes constraints on visual processing is minimal and visual processes transpire according to the current biases of the visual system. For example, EEG posterior/central alpha/beta power was reduced while viewing motions that conformed to biological constraints (Meirovitch et al, 2015), consistent with evidence that the visual system is predisposed to processing biological motion (e.g., Allison et al, 2000;Grossman et al, 2000;Plass et al, 2014). Posterior EEG beta power was reduced while experiencing binocular rivalry (Piantoni et al, 2010), that is, when competing percepts alternated according to changes in the adaptive state of the visual system (e.g., Kim et al, 2006;Wilson, 2007;Alais et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In the illusory-motion-reversal displays, the dominant percept of veridical motion occasionally reverses when the motion detectors tuned to the veridical motion sufficiently weaken due to adaptation, that is, when the state of the visual system becomes strongly biased in favor of processing the reversed motion. Evidence suggests that the visual system prioritizes the processing of biologically plausible motions (e.g., Allison et al, 2000;Grossman et al, 2000;Plass et al, 2014), that is, the visual motion mechanisms may be biased in favor of processing motion signals that conform to familiar biological constraints. This interpretation is consistent with the finding that motion-perception related alpha/beta-power reductions were greater for individuals with greater familiarity with the observed movements (Orgs et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent debates in the literature on multisensory perception have centered on the question of whether audiovisual integration in speech perception occurs automatically or relies on other factors, such as attention (Navarra, Alsius, Soto-Faraco, & Spence, 2010), awareness (Plass, Guzman-Martinez, Ortega, Grabowecky, & Suzuki, 2014), or recognition of speech stimuli as speech related (Tuomainen, Andersen, Tiippana, & Sams, 2005;Vroomen & Stekelenburg, 2011). While visual modulation of auditory speech perception is one of the most studied topics in the field of multisensory perception, far less research has focused on the converse-auditory effects on visual speech perception (Alsius & Munhall, 2013;Baart & Vroomen, 2010;Palmer & Ramsey, 2012;Sweeny et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%