Fat quantification in skeletal muscle using multigradient-echo imaging: Comparison of fat and water references. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal 1
Fat quantification in skeletal muscleFat quantification in skeletal muscle using multigradient-echo imaging: comparison of fat and water references 2
Fat quantification in skeletal muscle
AbstractPurpose: To compare the precision, accuracy, and repeatability of water/fat imaging-based fat quantification in muscle tissue using small or large flip angles (FAs), and a water or fat reference for calculation of the proton density fat fraction (FF).
Materials and methods:An Intralipid phantom and both forearms of six patients suffering from lymphedema and ten healthy volunteers were investigated in a 1.5T scanner. Two multigradient-echo sequences with eight echo times and FAs of 10° and 85° were acquired, respectively. For healthy volunteers, the acquisition of the right arm was performed twice with repositioning. From each set, water reference FF and fat reference FF images were reconstructed and the average FF and the standard deviation were calculated within the subfascial compartment. The small FA water reference was considered the reference standard.Results: The use of a fat reference effectively avoided bias due to T 1 weighting when using a large FA. The large FA fat reference approach also resulted in the highest precision, but no significant difference in repeatability between the various methods was detected.
Conclusion:The precision of fat quantification in muscle tissue can be increased with maintained accuracy using a larger flip angle, if a fat reference instead of a water reference is used.