2009
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181af7fb3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipid Emulsion Improves Recovery from Bupivacaine-Induced Cardiac Arrest, but Not from Ropivacaine- or Mepivacaine-Induced Cardiac Arrest

Abstract: These data show that the effects of lipid infusion on LA-induced cardiac arrest are strongly dependent on the administered LAs itself. We conclude that lipophilicity of LAs has a marked impact on the efficacy of lipid infusions to treat cardiac arrest induced by these drugs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
50
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first, administration of intravenous lipid emulsion serves to create an expanded intravascular lipid phase into which toxins of high lipophilicity are sequested away from pharmacological sites of action [3][4][5]. Consistent with this thesis, a maximal response to lipid emulsion has been observed with toxins of highest lipophilicity for both local anaesthetics [27,28] and beta adrenergic blocking agents [17,29]. Augmented carriage of toxin to non-vital lipidrich tissues may additionally speed redistribution from pharmacological sites of action [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the first, administration of intravenous lipid emulsion serves to create an expanded intravascular lipid phase into which toxins of high lipophilicity are sequested away from pharmacological sites of action [3][4][5]. Consistent with this thesis, a maximal response to lipid emulsion has been observed with toxins of highest lipophilicity for both local anaesthetics [27,28] and beta adrenergic blocking agents [17,29]. Augmented carriage of toxin to non-vital lipidrich tissues may additionally speed redistribution from pharmacological sites of action [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Zausig et al could show in an animal study that the lipid emulsion had no influence on the recovery time from local anaesthetics induced cardiac arrest to the return of first signs of cardiac activity. However, after the return of heart rhythm, lipid emulsions significantly decreased the recovery time for heart rate and RPP (RPP = (left ventricular systolic pressure − left ventricular diastolic pressure) × heart rate) in bupivacaine-induced cardiac toxicity, but not in mepivacaine-or ropivacaine-induced cardiac toxicity [22]. So in conclusion intravenous lipid emulsions may show an effect on neurological results of mepivacaine overdose, but their effect in the treatment of cardiac symptoms is not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In regard to local anesthetics, bupivacaine is highly lipophilic (LogP, 3.6; LogD, 2.7 at pH 7.4) and the associated toxicity is responsive to LRT, whereas less lipophilic local anesthetics like ropivacaine (LogP, 2.9) and mepivacaine (LogP, 2.0) are also clinically responsive but LRT may not produce as robust a recovery in experimental models of overdose. 59,60 Meta-analysis confirms this discrepancy as ILE produced a robust and homogenous benefit for bupivacaine toxicity, but ILE for mepivacaine was an outlier in 1 study based on funnel-plot analysis. 8 The logP-dependent benefit extends to animal models of β-blocker toxicity, where overdose with the most lipophilic β-blocker, propranolol (LogP, 3.1), responds to treatment with lipid emulsion 61 whereas overdoses of less lipophilic β-blockers metoprolol 62 (LogP, 1.79) and atenolol 63 (LogP, 0.1) are less responsive.…”
Section: Bindingmentioning
confidence: 96%