1982
DOI: 10.1002/bip.360210615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipid‐induced conformational changes in glucagon, secretin, and vasoactive intestinal peptide

Abstract: SynopsisThe CD of glucagon, secretin, and vasoactive intestinal peptide has been studied as a function of temperature in water and in aqueous solutions of dodecyl sulfate, phosphatidyl glycerol, and L-a-phosphatidic acid (dipalmitoyl). The anionic detergent and lipids induce helix formation in all three peptides, with the amount of induced helical content increasing in the order glucagon < secretin < vasoactive intestinal peptide. These observations are subject to quantitative rationalization using a matrix fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been hypothesized that they are crucial to the function of binding to lipids and cell membranes (24)(25)(26). Studies of synthetic analogs containing amphiphilic portions of apolipoproteins (27,28), mellitin (25), and (3-endorphin (26) der in H20 have significant helical structure in the presence of lipids, in agreement with their predicted helical potential (30,31). The functional importance of the amphiphilic helices is pinpointed by the low activity of CRF10-41, which lacks only the first three residues of this structural unit (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…It has been hypothesized that they are crucial to the function of binding to lipids and cell membranes (24)(25)(26). Studies of synthetic analogs containing amphiphilic portions of apolipoproteins (27,28), mellitin (25), and (3-endorphin (26) der in H20 have significant helical structure in the presence of lipids, in agreement with their predicted helical potential (30,31). The functional importance of the amphiphilic helices is pinpointed by the low activity of CRF10-41, which lacks only the first three residues of this structural unit (4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, the V H domain must also exert a bene®cial effect on stabilization of the transition state of VIP, even though its interactions with VIP appear to be limited to a subsite remote from the reaction center. The possible explanations for this novel behavior are: (1) ground state destabilizing effects at the reaction center in VIP, as opposed to overall stabilization of the peptide occurring upon F v binding, could lead to an improved catalytic rate constant and kinetic ef®-ciency, as is theoretically possible in catalysts containing distinct chemically reactive and ground state binding subsites (Menger, 1992); or (2) in view of the large contact area available within antibody active sites and the¯exibility of small polypeptide substrates like VIP (Robinson et al, 1982), the V H domain may stabilize transition statespeci®c subsites in VIP remote from the tetrahedral carbon at the scissile bond. This hypothesis is supported by computer models of VIP, in which conversion of the trigonal carbon at the Lys20 ± Lys21 scissile bond to a tetrahedral state produced spatial movements of the backbone and amino acid sidechains distant from the scissile bond, raising the possibility of formation of new subsites in the transition state (Paul, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Putting these findings together, it is most likely that binding of OEA to GLP-1 may induce a conformational change of the peptide and is accompanied with an enhancement in potency. This proposed model is evocative of a scenario in which peptide ligands for class B GPCRs can be induced to undergo a conformational change in the presence of lipids (38) or upon interaction with their cognate receptors (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%