2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2021.101096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipid nanovesicles for biomedical applications: ‘What is in a name’?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 285 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were macroscopically characterized as single phase, transparent, isotropic, and fluid formulations. , The selection of tricaprylin was based on its ability to dissolve lipophilic drugs like fenretinide and the acceptable safety profile . In addition to its ability to form liquid-crystalline phases, PC was selected due to its biocompatibility, which implicates in low irritation potential. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were macroscopically characterized as single phase, transparent, isotropic, and fluid formulations. , The selection of tricaprylin was based on its ability to dissolve lipophilic drugs like fenretinide and the acceptable safety profile . In addition to its ability to form liquid-crystalline phases, PC was selected due to its biocompatibility, which implicates in low irritation potential. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 In addition to its ability to form liquid-crystalline phases, PC was selected due to its biocompatibility, which implicates in low irritation potential. 31,38 PC and tricaprylin (T) (9:1, w/w) were vortex-mixed (Genie 2, Scientific Industries, Bohemia, NY) and heated at 50 °C in a water bath. Subsequently, PG was added to the PCT mixture at 40 and 50%, forming two MEs: ME 9:1−40% and ME 9:1−50% were composed of PC/T/PG at 54:6:40 and 45:5:50 (w/w/w), respectively.…”
Section: Non-aqueous Me Development and Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their appeal stems from their applicability as nanocarriers for drug delivery, in modeling cell mimicking studies, and supporting theories on the origins of life. [ 176–178 ] The success in these fields can be attributed to several factors, including their ability to: (i) encapsulate hydrophilic/hydrophobic drugs, (ii) functionalize their surface for targeted applications, and (iii) easily manipulate their composition to produce rigid or flexible vesicles depending on the intended use [171] . These benefits are translatable for H 2 S sensing in biological settings and enable formerly impracticable applications, as previously shown [179] .…”
Section: H2s Detection By Nanomaterial‐based Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promising strategy is the functionalization of liposomes with surfactants, which allows for controlling the size, shape and charge characteristics of vesicular nanocarriers, improving drug loading, overcoming the biological barriers, etc. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Key factors that should be considered upon the modification are the nature of surfactant head group, hydrophobicity and presence of unsaturated C-C bonds in alkyl chains, and lipid/surfactant ratio [29].…”
Section: Lipid Nanocarriers Modified With Amphiphilic Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that surfactants are capable of irreversible integration with lipid bilayer far beyond their critical micellar concentration due to lateral interactions [30], thereby markedly changing surface characteristics of liposomes. Surfactant-modified vesicles exhibit essentially improved physicochemical properties and functionality, which in some cases resulted in the isolation of special types of flexible or elastic (deformable) vehicles with enhanced skin permeability, the so-called transferosomes [26,[31][32][33], and alternative carriers, niosomes [35].…”
Section: Lipid Nanocarriers Modified With Amphiphilic Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%