2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipiodol lOcalization for Ground-glass opacity mInimal Surgery: Rationale and design of the LOGIS trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ongoing LOGIS trial is a prospective multicenter, controlled, comparative phase III trial designed to demonstrate the comparative usefulness and safety of lipiodol and hook-wire localization for GGO lung lesions [15] . Although the LOGIS trial is expected to provide valuable information, its non-randomized controlled study design renders it prone to selection and assessment bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The ongoing LOGIS trial is a prospective multicenter, controlled, comparative phase III trial designed to demonstrate the comparative usefulness and safety of lipiodol and hook-wire localization for GGO lung lesions [15] . Although the LOGIS trial is expected to provide valuable information, its non-randomized controlled study design renders it prone to selection and assessment bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements for participating sites to contribute to the LOGIS registry are same as those stipulated for the LOGIS trial [15] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 Multiple preoperative localization methods have been used to localize the small lung nodule, such as CT-guided percutaneous puncture or hookwire, CT-guided (CT-G) injection of lipiodol or methylene blue dye, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopic-guided dye marking, and virtual assisted lung mapping. [3][4][5][6] CT-G percutaneous needle puncture localization is currently the most commonly used approach for localization. Although this technique has a success rate of over 95%, the limitations are well documented too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%