2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11512-007-0069-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipschitz continuity of the Green function in Denjoy domains

Abstract: In this paper a Wiener-type characterization is presented of those boundary points of a Denjoy domain where the Green function is Lipschitz continuous. This property is linked with the splitting of a Euclidean boundary point into two minimal Martin boundary points.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the geometry of E satisfying (1.2), we refer the reader to [9,14,10,3] and the many references therein.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the geometry of E satisfying (1.2), we refer the reader to [9,14,10,3] and the many references therein.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to [9,17,10,1] Next, we derive some estimates of E n from above. According to [17,Theorem 10.5] the only nontrivial unknown case is where E consists of an infinite number of components.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ideas from [10], we will show that condition (ii) in Theorem 1.2 is equivalent to the corresponding condition in Theorem 1.1. For any compact set K ⊂ R N , we denote by v K the capacitary potential of K, and by μ K the associated Riesz measure.…”
Section: The Case N ≥mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim is to obtain precise conditions on the set E for the existence of a positive harmonic function u on that vanishes on E and satisfies u ≥ h + on , where h + is assigned the value 0 outside U. We will do this firstly in terms of harmonic measure, by adapting ideas from Benedicks [7], Gardiner [15] and Cranston and Salisbury [12], and then more explicitly in terms of capacity, using methods from Carleson and Totik [9] and Carroll and Gardiner [10]. We have to develop additional techniques to cope with the absence of the symmetry and reflection arguments that are available when ∂ is contained in a hyperplane or union of lines, and with the fundamentally differing potential theoretic natures of U and R N \U.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%