2020
DOI: 10.3934/mcrf.2020014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipschitz stability for some coupled degenerate parabolic systems with locally distributed observations of one component

Abstract: This article presents an inverse source problem for a cascade system of n coupled degenerate parabolic equations. In particular, we prove stability and uniqueness results for the inverse problem of determining the source terms by observations in an arbitrary subdomain over a time interval of only one component and data of the n components at a fixed positive time T over the whole spatial domain. The proof is based on the application of a Carleman estimate with a single observation acting on a subdomain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 6. Note that, in [3] Theorem 3.6 is shown for θ(t) = 1 t 4 (T −t) 4 . However, by [1, Remark 1], one can prove that the result remains true also for θ…”
Section: (Sd) Case There Existsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 6. Note that, in [3] Theorem 3.6 is shown for θ(t) = 1 t 4 (T −t) 4 . However, by [1, Remark 1], one can prove that the result remains true also for θ…”
Section: (Sd) Case There Existsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, for instance, in the absence of the nonlocal term, the equation y t − ay xx = 0 can be rewritten as y t − (ay x ) x + a x y x = 0 (3) only if a x exists. Moreover, as described in [8], degenerate equations of the form (3), are well-posed in L 2 (0, 1) under the structural assumption…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. For the proof see [3,Theorem 3.3], where this inequality is established for a coupled parabolic system in (t 0 , T ) × (0, 1) instead of Q. However, this inequality remains true in (0, T ) × (0, 1) with suitable changes.…”
Section: Carleman Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof For the proof, see Allal et al, 22, Theorem 3.3 where this inequality is established for a coupled parabolic system in ( t 0 , T ) × (0, 1) instead of Q . However, this inequality remains true in (0, T ) × (0, 1) with suitable changes.…”
Section: Carleman Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%