1990
DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.30.3_69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquefaction-Induced Flow Failure of Embankments and Residual Strength of Silty Sands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the friction angle of the liquefied sandy material from the Ohzumi landslide is approximately 14°. It is noted that this value falls within the range of 13-17°, the range of friction angles that is typical for liquefied sands, according to numerous case studies (de Alba et al 1987;Ishihara et al 1990;Ishihara 1993;Stark and Mesri 1992;Olson and Stark 2003). Number of cycles to 5% axial strain Cyclic Stress Ratio, CSR The results of slope stability analysis presented in Fig.…”
Section: Assessment Of Slope Stability After Earthquakementioning
confidence: 86%
“…It was found that the friction angle of the liquefied sandy material from the Ohzumi landslide is approximately 14°. It is noted that this value falls within the range of 13-17°, the range of friction angles that is typical for liquefied sands, according to numerous case studies (de Alba et al 1987;Ishihara et al 1990;Ishihara 1993;Stark and Mesri 1992;Olson and Stark 2003). Number of cycles to 5% axial strain Cyclic Stress Ratio, CSR The results of slope stability analysis presented in Fig.…”
Section: Assessment Of Slope Stability After Earthquakementioning
confidence: 86%
“…When assessing liquefaction potential and related cyclic failures in sloping grounds, the soil element is subjected to the static shear stress maintained all the way through, before, during, and after an earthquake shaking, though it may decrease as a result of changes in the configuration occurring in the earth structures due to seismic shaking (Ishihara et al 1990). Then, in the analysis, measured shear resistance under a certain given number of cycles is compared against the seismically induced driving shear stress.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the relation between the cone tip resistance and undrained shear strength of soils is examined based on the data of undrained shear strength of soils estimated from each site of ‰ow failure and the results of Dutch cone penetration tests conducted during the post-earthquakeˆeld reconnaissance investigations. The details of the case history studies reported by Ishihara et al (1990aIshihara et al ( , 1990b) are summarized in Table 2. The main focus of the past studies was to estimate the undrained shear strength of soils from post-earthquake stability analysis, and to correlate it with the cone tip resistance observed along the depth of`collapsed' debris of sliding soil mass.…”
Section: Case History Studies On Cone Penetration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The undrained shear strength ratio, Sus/s? vo, of soils mobilized at this site is estimated to be about 0.12, based on the following simple expression (Ishihara et al, 1990a),…”
Section: Tsukidate Landslidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation