2006
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high‐solids concentrations

Abstract: To improve process economics of the lignocellulose to ethanol process a reactor system for enzymatic liquefaction and saccharification at high-solids concentrations was developed. The technology is based on free fall mixing employing a horizontally placed drum with a horizontal rotating shaft mounted with paddlers for mixing. Enzymatic liquefaction and saccharification of pretreated wheat straw was tested with up to 40% (w/w) initial DM. In less than 10 h, the structure of the material was changed from intact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
325
4
15

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
18
325
4
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary data are showing a moderate potential for raw switchgrass, at 0.125 m 3 CH 4 / kg VS. 45 Its high solid content (400 kg VS/ wet ton) places it at an estimated 650 m 3 CH 4 / ha, which is much lower than for the other crops, however there is a lot of room for improvement considering that this was obtained from less than 35% VS conversion. 46 In most of the aforementioned literature, there is no specii c pre-treatment of the crop prior to its anaerobic digestion, excepted particle size reduction (chopping, shredding, 51 Ensiling has been shown to have a positive impact most of the time, and may result in up to 31% more methane production from the crops. 23 h e particle size reduction had a dif erent ef ect on sugar and starch or cellulosic crops and lignocellulosic crops.…”
Section: Methane Yield From Cellulosic and Lignocellulosic Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary data are showing a moderate potential for raw switchgrass, at 0.125 m 3 CH 4 / kg VS. 45 Its high solid content (400 kg VS/ wet ton) places it at an estimated 650 m 3 CH 4 / ha, which is much lower than for the other crops, however there is a lot of room for improvement considering that this was obtained from less than 35% VS conversion. 46 In most of the aforementioned literature, there is no specii c pre-treatment of the crop prior to its anaerobic digestion, excepted particle size reduction (chopping, shredding, 51 Ensiling has been shown to have a positive impact most of the time, and may result in up to 31% more methane production from the crops. 23 h e particle size reduction had a dif erent ef ect on sugar and starch or cellulosic crops and lignocellulosic crops.…”
Section: Methane Yield From Cellulosic and Lignocellulosic Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b), corresponding to theoretical ethanol yields of 93.0 % and 90.9 %, respectively. This phenomenon appeared in many other studies, due to inefficient mixing and mass transfer with increased solids concentration (Jørgensen et al 2007;Han et al 2011).…”
Section: Partial Ssf With Pretreated Gu At High Solids Loadingsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Enzymatic saccharification or fermentation with high solids generally induces a lack of available water, high viscosity, and thereby an insufficient transfer of biomass and heat in reaction. Therefore, the rapid liquefaction of pretreated biomass is a key factor in determining fermentation productivity and yield (Jørgensen et al 2007). Thus, the impeller was characterized according to mixing behavior; the use of the plate-and-frame, doublecurved-blade impeller, and peg mixer was at first avoided because of limited power input and structure in the 5-L fermenter (Modenbach and Nokes 2012).…”
Section: Partial Ssf With Pretreated Gu At High Solids Loadingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, high solids loading increased the concentrations of inhibitors such as organic acids (Fig. 2B) and other accumulated by-products (Jorgensen et al 2007). The produced acids may change the osmotic pressure of the yeast cells, and the sensitivity of the yeast to fermentation byproducts (Fig.…”
Section: Batch Fermentation-based Pre-hydrolysis Ssfmentioning
confidence: 95%