2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid cooling techniques in proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks: A detailed survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that liquid cooling systems are more suitable because the heat transfer coefficients for liquid flow are much higher than those for air flow. The main drawbacks of liquid cooling include the great amount of power consumed by the accessory system, coolant degradation, and increases in the mass of overall system take-off weight [13,14]. In the case of an air-cooled PEMFC stack, a simple cooling system and devices characterised by low levels of power consumption can be implemented, although the resulting efficiency level may be lower than in devices using a liquid cooling medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that liquid cooling systems are more suitable because the heat transfer coefficients for liquid flow are much higher than those for air flow. The main drawbacks of liquid cooling include the great amount of power consumed by the accessory system, coolant degradation, and increases in the mass of overall system take-off weight [13,14]. In the case of an air-cooled PEMFC stack, a simple cooling system and devices characterised by low levels of power consumption can be implemented, although the resulting efficiency level may be lower than in devices using a liquid cooling medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Accordingly, in the past decade, the adoption of nanofluids has started as suitable coolants for PEMFC stacks, taking into account the enhancement of electrical conductivity, which should be low to avoid shunt currents. [5][6][7] Leong et al 3 performed experiments to investigate the thermal performance of a car radiator operating with copper/ethylene glycol nanofluids in the turbulent flow regime. They found that a 3.8% enhancement of heat transfer could be achieved by adding 2 vol% of copper nanoparticles to the pure ethylene glycol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufactured FC coolant could maintain the low electrical conductivity for at least two years as well as provide heat transfer effectively compared with the water-based coolant. 7,30 Then, increasing the electrical conductivity is not desirable when applying nanofluids as coolants for many electrical devices, such as PEMFC stacks. The allowable limit of electrical conductivity value with nanofluids applications is 1.5 to 2 μS/cm or and 5 μS/cm at 20 C, that requiring to keep at low values for a long time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The air-cooled PEM systems are classified into two main categories: the active and the passive types. 15,16 The main difference between these two approaches is the way that the air is introduced in the system. In the case where the reactant air (oxygen reduction reaction) and the air for cooling are supplied to the system separately via two different pathways, then the cooling is considered as active.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat produced may be removed by dissipation to surroundings, unused reactants or air cooled PEMFC systems 14 . The air‐cooled PEM systems are classified into two main categories: the active and the passive types 15,16 . The main difference between these two approaches is the way that the air is introduced in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%