1981
DOI: 10.1080/00986448108910935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid Dispersion Mechanisms in Agitated Tanks: Part Ii. Straight Blade and Disc Style Turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This regularity in the direction of drop elongation would indicate that breakup occurred in the anisotropic turbulent region. Experimental and modeling results presented by Konno et al (1983) and Chang et al (1981) suggest that the rms turbulent fluctuating velocities in regions where the flow regime is anisotropic could be important in the breakup of floc particles. Therefore, an increase in the rms fluctuating velocity with increasing tank size, as shown in this study, could explain why investigators have seen a degradation in flocculation performance with increasing tank size.…”
Section: Implication Of Experimental Results On Flocculation Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This regularity in the direction of drop elongation would indicate that breakup occurred in the anisotropic turbulent region. Experimental and modeling results presented by Konno et al (1983) and Chang et al (1981) suggest that the rms turbulent fluctuating velocities in regions where the flow regime is anisotropic could be important in the breakup of floc particles. Therefore, an increase in the rms fluctuating velocity with increasing tank size, as shown in this study, could explain why investigators have seen a degradation in flocculation performance with increasing tank size.…”
Section: Implication Of Experimental Results On Flocculation Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, if breakup occurred at scales where the flow regime is anisotropic or at scales outside the universal equilibrium range, then the maximum floc size cannot be uniquely described by 2 and can be influenced by flocculator geometry. Based on data from emulsification experiments, Konno et al (1983) and Chang et al (1981) displayed photographic evidence that a large portion of the oil droplets was broken behind the Rushton turbine blade. The breaking drops appeared to follow the outward flow along the impeller blade.…”
Section: Implication Of Experimental Results On Flocculation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 For dispersions with a low-viscosity dispersed phase it has been found that drops burst and several smaller drops of comparable size are obtained. 17,18 Whereas for high-viscosity drops, rupturing occurs via stretching leading to formation of bimodal distributions. 7,17,18 The results obtained in this work for the viscous subrange clearly point to a change in the pattern of evolution of drops-size distributions with viscosity ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Whereas for high-viscosity drops, rupturing occurs via stretching leading to formation of bimodal distributions. 7,17,18 The results obtained in this work for the viscous subrange clearly point to a change in the pattern of evolution of drops-size distributions with viscosity ratio. Figure 3 presents typical time evolution of drop-size distributions for a lowviscosity oil phase, 0.65 cSt, and a high-viscosity silicon oil, 100 cSt (viscosity ratios of 0.49 and 96.50, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results may apply to more concentrated dispersions when coalescence is minimized by the presence of stabilizing agents (Valentas et al, 1966). In a turbulent stirred tank contactor, drop breakup is believed to be confined to the impeller region, and is due to variations in turbulent pressure along the drop's surface (Hinze, 1955) and to stretch-ing of globules in the trailing vortex system created by the impeller ( Ali et al, 1981;Chang et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%