Molten Salt Reactors and Thorium Energy 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-101126-3.00011-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid fuel, thermal neutron spectrum reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the accumulation of 233 U and the reduction of 235 U in the fuel salt are adverse to graphite‐moderator temperature coefficient, especially for a small SVF situation. Therefore, the TRC with different SVFs is also simulated up to 10 years (see Figure ) to prevent the FPs concentration in the fuel salt from exceeding its solubility limit (about 1%) during the whole operation . When the SVF is less than 20%, the TRC at 10 years is much greater than that at the beginning of life.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the accumulation of 233 U and the reduction of 235 U in the fuel salt are adverse to graphite‐moderator temperature coefficient, especially for a small SVF situation. Therefore, the TRC with different SVFs is also simulated up to 10 years (see Figure ) to prevent the FPs concentration in the fuel salt from exceeding its solubility limit (about 1%) during the whole operation . When the SVF is less than 20%, the TRC at 10 years is much greater than that at the beginning of life.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the TRC with different SVFs is also simulated up to 10 years (see Figure 5) to prevent the FPs concentration in the fuel salt from exceeding its solubility limit (about 1%) during the whole operation. 45 When the SVF is less than 20%, the TRC at 10 years is much greater than that at the beginning of life. The TRC at 10 years for the SVF between 8% and 14% tends to be almost positive, which indicates that the SVF < 8% or SVF > 14% should be selected to ensure the safe operation of SMMSR.…”
Section: Once-through Fuel Cycle Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, some fraction of β eff is "lost" from the core [26,27]. The real β eff value is lower from the value calculated by MCNP, which can range from 10% in MSR-FUJI to 40% in MSBR case [28]. Calculation of lost β eff is beyond the scope of this study so that the β eff value calculated is left as it is.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Verification of the DYMOS code against experimental data of MSRE, which was operated at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in the 1960s adopting fluoride fuel salt with graphite moderator, is already reported by the authors [23,24,25]. In a summary, DYMOS There is a benchmark report for MSRE zeropower experiments, where various models are compared with MSRE data [26].…”
Section: Verification For Msre Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%