Sampling Results and Conclusions Askins, et al. (1951), describe gas sampling from Shell Oil Company's FCC regenerator. They withdrew gas samples from various points in the fluid catalyst bed of a 40-ft diameter catalytic cracking regenerator. A filter in their sampling tube prevented catalyst contamination of their gas samples. Catalyst samples were not taken. Gas analyses indicated that a high degree of gas downmixing exists, since essentially no variation in gas composition was found at any point. They also concluded that most of the gas introduced passed through the bed in the form of bubbles, rather than flowing around and fluidizing the catalyst particles. Preferential CO2 adsorption on catalyst was also found. Our sampling system successfully sampled partially regenerated catalyst and flue gas and measured temperatures at six locations in the dense bed. Results are shown in Table II and Figures 2-4. Operating conditions for the Richmond FCC reactor and regenerator are shown in Tables III and IV.Carbon analyses show that mixing is better than expected. Most of the catalyst is fairly well regenerated 3 ft above the grid. Some catalyst samples collected in the no. 5 sampler contain less coke than the "fully" regenerated Literature Cited