1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02653332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid phase epitaxy growth of InGaAs with rare-earth gettering: Characterization and deep level transient spectroscopy studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All layers are of n-type conductivity and the electron concentration is decreased to 4×10 15 cm −3 . Another paper of Misprint in ligature due to oxygen in LPE grown InGaAs with Dy admixture (Kumar et al, 1995). He further states that Dy gettering not only results in decreased carrier concentration and increased mobility but also better morphology and lower etch pit density is achieved.…”
Section: Semiconductor Technologies 298mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All layers are of n-type conductivity and the electron concentration is decreased to 4×10 15 cm −3 . Another paper of Misprint in ligature due to oxygen in LPE grown InGaAs with Dy admixture (Kumar et al, 1995). He further states that Dy gettering not only results in decreased carrier concentration and increased mobility but also better morphology and lower etch pit density is achieved.…”
Section: Semiconductor Technologies 298mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Typical LPE InP layers grown under these conditions posses electron concentrations above 10 17 cm −3 at room temperature. In addition to the above self-evident precautions, there are several methods to suppress residual impurity concentrations (Rhee & Bhattacharya, 1983;Kumar et al, 1995): -Prolonged baking of the growth solution above the growth temperature. A long bake-out under the dry hydrogen atmosphere leads to the removal of volatile impurities such as Zn, Mg, Cd, Te, and Se from the In melt by the evaporation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical LPE InP layers grown under these conditions posses electron concentrations above 10 17 cm −3 at room temperature. In addition to the above self-evident precautions, there are several methods to suppress residual impurity concentrations (Rhee & Bhattacharya, 1983;Kumar et al, 1995):…”
Section: Present Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as having larger concentrations, the donors prevail over acceptors also due to their lesser [4]) to be of less perfect purity than the constituent elements (In, P, etc) and hence, if present in the melt at higher quantities, RE admixture could introduce to the solid phase unwanted acceptors of its own. (iii) There are indications ( [1]) that affinity of RE atoms to donor species is distinctly higher than to acceptors. With increasing RE content in the melt, donors are progressively removed while acceptors remain and become dominant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An alternative way of removing impurities consists in employment of the large chemical affinity of rareearth (RE) elements toward the contaminants. Silicides (RE 3 Si 5 or RESi 2 ), sulfides (RE 2 S 3 ), and other reaction products of RE and impurity atoms are stable and insoluble in the growth melt [1]. Due to their large radii, RE atoms are only exceptionally (the case of ytterbium and cerium in InP, as suggested by luminescence spectra [2,3]) incorporated into the host lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%