1963
DOI: 10.1021/i160006a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid-Phase Mass Transfer at Low Reynolds Numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The material balance equation of an individual enantiomer j ((R)-, (S)-OH) in the porous support matrix is then given by Pore diffusion Eq. (3) is coupled with the external bulk concentrations in the organic solvent stream flowing through the packed bed reactor through the following boundary condition, where k, is the external liquid-solid mass transfer coefficient, estimated from a correlation given by Williamson, Bazaire, and Geankoplis (1963) for mass transfer in packed beds at low Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: ( 5 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material balance equation of an individual enantiomer j ((R)-, (S)-OH) in the porous support matrix is then given by Pore diffusion Eq. (3) is coupled with the external bulk concentrations in the organic solvent stream flowing through the packed bed reactor through the following boundary condition, where k, is the external liquid-solid mass transfer coefficient, estimated from a correlation given by Williamson, Bazaire, and Geankoplis (1963) for mass transfer in packed beds at low Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: ( 5 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis by Powers et al also showed that dissolution is sensitive to the mass transfer coefficient correlation. Simulations using (2) and an earlier measurement by Williamson et al [1963] were compared; however, they are the same correlation, with the only difference being that Williamson et al [1963] used a constant porosity.…”
Section: Mass Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When mass transfer in the fluid phase is the controlling step, therefore, the usual design relationships' for mass transfer in packed beds (Gupta and Thodos, 1962;Wilson and Geankoplis, 1966;Williamson et al, 1963) are either unsuitable on account of the absence of a Grashof number, or do not cover (Karabelas et-al., 1971) the low Schmidt numbers (-10) which characterize diffusion of light organic solutes in supercritical fluids. (molecular weight -100) in supercritical fluids (Sc = v/ ).…”
Section: 1: Physical Properties and Mass Transfer Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%