2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid residence time distribution of multiphase horizontal flow in packed bed milli-channel: Spherical beads versus open cell solid foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from designs 1, 3, and 4 indicate that there is an optimum pillar-spacing range where the passages between pillars are occupied by both phases in an alternating fashion (design 3). Our results resemble those of Serres et al 54 who compared spherical beads versus open cell solid foams obtaining better mass transfer within the former system. Serres et al 55 and Arbabi et al 56 also demonstrated the formation of Taylor gas bubbles across irregular 3D packings, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Solid Propertiespillar Arrangementsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Results from designs 1, 3, and 4 indicate that there is an optimum pillar-spacing range where the passages between pillars are occupied by both phases in an alternating fashion (design 3). Our results resemble those of Serres et al 54 who compared spherical beads versus open cell solid foams obtaining better mass transfer within the former system. Serres et al 55 and Arbabi et al 56 also demonstrated the formation of Taylor gas bubbles across irregular 3D packings, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Solid Propertiespillar Arrangementsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…According to the literature, it was observed that few studies were reported on the hydrodynamics and the residence time distribution (RTD) in the miniature fixed‐bed devices of cylindrical shape, 60‐62 square shape, 62,63 and the rectangular miniature multichannel, with the packing, 64,65 and without the packing 66 . These researches are not adequate in the level of applications of the miniature fixed‐bed devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed models have also been developed like the PDE (piston flow with axial dispersion and mass exchange between the dynamic and the stagnant zone) model, by dividing the liquid phase in a packed bed into a dynamic and a stagnant zone 51 53 or models with discrete series of continuous mixing cells containing a stagnant zone. 54 However, in micropacked beds with gas–liquid flow, few studies exist on the characterization of dispersion characteristics. Marquez et al., 55 found that the dispersion in a small milli-packed bed (2 mm inner diameter and 90 cm long, 115 μm glass spheres), operated under a limited fluid-mechanical interaction of the gas phase with the liquid, was lower than the dispersion in an equivalent single-liquid-phase system by a factor of 2–3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%