Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012436603-9/50010-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid Scintillation Analysis: Principles and Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…234,238 U activity concentration was determined using a photon/electron rejecting alpha liquid scintillation (PERALS) liquid scintillation spectrometer with alpha-beta separation from ORDELA (Oak Ridge, TN, USA) [ 39 ]. 210 Po activity concentration was determined using alpha spectrometry with surface barrier silicon PIPS detectors from Canberra (Meriden, CT, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…234,238 U activity concentration was determined using a photon/electron rejecting alpha liquid scintillation (PERALS) liquid scintillation spectrometer with alpha-beta separation from ORDELA (Oak Ridge, TN, USA) [ 39 ]. 210 Po activity concentration was determined using alpha spectrometry with surface barrier silicon PIPS detectors from Canberra (Meriden, CT, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, uranium was extracted using URAEX scintillation cocktail [ 16 , 44 ]. Finally, in order to improve energy resolution, the sample in the scintillation vial was bubbled with a gas mixture of argon and toluene (for extraction of dissolved oxygen) [ 39 ]. The chemical yield of the analysis ranged from 88% to 96%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current best practice typically requires the use of two PMTs to perform coincidence processing on events to determine whether the event is due to scintillation in the vial [12] or arises from either Fig. 3.…”
Section: Vial With Pmtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, the exclusion method [12] was used: two counting windows were selected, the first region (5-700) included the whole spectrum of 90 Sr and the lower energies of 90 Y and the second region (701-1024) covered the rest of 90 Y spectrum. The counting efficiencies of both radionuclides were calculated for different geometries (volume of scintillation cocktail and sample) using a 90 Sr-90 Y equilibrium solution standardized by the CIEMAT-NIST method [13]. The values found for 90 Sr and 90 Y were 98% and 99.8% respectively when 15 mL cocktail + 50 µL sample were used and 97% and 98% for 16 mL cocktail and 4 mL sample.…”
Section: Liquid Scintillation Counting Of 90 Sr and 90 Ymentioning
confidence: 99%